Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Albion] What's going on at the Argus Sub Editors desk?







Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
57,228
Faversham






Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,902
Uffern
What do people expect when the pay for newly-trained journalists is barely enough to live on?
It's also the sheer volume of stuff that they're expected to contribute - very little time to do any proper research
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
57,228
Faversham
Not much else he could really do, if he was alive in his grave.
It is one of those 'amusing' quotes that I have pinched from the wider world.
This one was first used to my knowledge in Private Eye more than 40 years ago.
And if Richard Ingrams were alive today....

I gather from above the the reason for the shoddy Argus journalism is the low pay given to young journalists.
Something Something 'there is a reason why I don't buy the Sun or indeed shop in Iceland'.
If the Argus can't be arsed to pay enough to employ competent people, the readership might consider seeking elsewhere for information?
Just a thought :shrug:
 




happypig

Staring at the rude boys
May 23, 2009
8,261
Eastbourne
It is one of those 'amusing' quotes that I have pinched from the wider world.
This one was first used to my knowledge in Private Eye more than 40 years ago.
And if Richard Ingrams were alive today....
Wasn't it Gerald R. Ford who said it about Lincoln ? (Both of whom have aircraft carriers named after them)
 






ClemFandango

Active member
Oct 2, 2023
174
It is one of those 'amusing' quotes that I have pinched from the wider world.
This one was first used to my knowledge in Private Eye more than 40 years ago.
And if Richard Ingrams were alive today....

I gather from above the the reason for the shoddy Argus journalism is the low pay given to young journalists.
Something Something 'there is a reason why I don't buy the Sun or indeed shop in Iceland'.
If the Argus can't be arsed to pay enough to employ competent people, the readership might consider seeking elsewhere for information?
Just a thought :shrug:
Google and Facebook take 98% of the world’s advertising revenue. Legacy media are scrapping for the other 2%, meaning their businesses are increasingly unviable, hence the pitiful salaries. Soon there will be no local journalists, it will all be done by AI
 


Lenny Rider

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2010
6,144
Nicely lobbed, then scarper
He's off again, you clearly need that coffee....... :lolol:

You were about at the same time so you know exactly where I'm coming from, aside from founding it at a time when football clubs really didn't do that sort of thing Steve put his heart and soul into the thing for nearly a quarter of a century, to not even get a mention is pretty piss poor even by Argus standards.
 






Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
57,228
Faversham
Google and Facebook take 98% of the world’s advertising revenue. Legacy media are scrapping for the other 2%, meaning their businesses are increasingly unviable, hence the pitiful salaries. Soon there will be no local journalists, it will all be done by AI
Market forces.....I would like to be able to find an argument for state subsidy of local news media, but I can't :shrug:

If people stopped using the BBC I'd feel the same about that, but it is massively used still as far as I can see.
And it isn't a private company so it is a different entity altogether.

(Sorry, I can't tell if you regret the passing of Argus 'quality' or simply accept it as inevitable).
 


GJN1

Well-known member
Nov 4, 2014
1,585
Brighton
Google and Facebook take 98% of the world’s advertising revenue. Legacy media are scrapping for the other 2%, meaning their businesses are increasingly unviable, hence the pitiful salaries. Soon there will be no local journalists, it will all be done by AI
A lot of it already is at Reuters. They all have their own AI dashboard they can dip into it.
 




Monkey Man

Your support is not that great
Jan 30, 2005
3,240
Neither here nor there
Local newspapers, in their heyday, were made viable by advertising – not the cover price, which was never a particularly important part of the revenue stream (but did put a few helpful quid into the coffers of newsagents).

The sort of ad spend a local paper can now count on is a fraction of what it was in the 80s and 90s. And as revenue has collapsed, due to online competitors, journalist numbers (and training) has been culled accordingly.

I suspect most people would like a properly-staffed local paper, with fearless, independent reporting and all the other things that once made them popular.

The problem is, even if everyone was prepared to pay for that, the advertising won't be coming back.

Public apathy hasn't killed local papers. The internet has.
 




Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
31,902
Uffern
The problem is, even if everyone was prepared to pay for that, the advertising won't be coming back.

Public apathy hasn't killed local papers. The internet has.
About 25 years ago, I was an active NUJ member, had been chair of my branch. I had also been using the internet before the days of WWW and knew its potential. I wrote a regular column in the NUJ paper and also addressed a series of meetings in various locations warning of the effect that the web would have on the media and a) get better organised and b) learn new skills.

The overwhelming response from the journalists at those meetings is that I was talking a load of drivel and had no idea how rooted local newspapers were in the community. The internet was dismissed as a passing fad by just about everyone. It was a thoroughly depressing experience, got an inkling of what Cassandra must have felt like.

It's really sad what's happened to papers like the Argus but there was a real lack of foresight back in the day: the papers didn't know what hit them and how to react.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here