redoubtable seagull
Well-known member
- Oct 27, 2004
- 2,611
The crowd dynamics for Newcastle was a very strange.
There was a real buzz in the NS concourse pre-match for the Man City game, it was rammed, loads chatting, a few chants were going, quite a long wait time for the beer queue, and it felt really upbeat. You got the sense a lot of people had enjoyed a day of drinking before the game. Alcohol certainly gets the vocal chords going for a match and the atmosphere for that game wasn’t too bad.
Cut to Newcastle and pre-match was distinctly flat. The NS concourse was not that busy, we got our pre-match beers quickly and there was plenty of space to drink them.
So, my hardly empirical take on it is our crowd response is very influenced by how much has been drunk pre-match - probably why away games in London are more raucous as virtually everyone will have travelled on the train and most have had a few to drink.
As others have said, as a crowd we tend to react to events on the pitch. Man City being a recent example where the team played well in the 2nd half and the crowd responded. There wasn’t a great deal to get excited about on Saturday about watching the ball move from side to side and backwards as we tried to find a way to break through a very boring, defensive team. We’re not playing so crap that there’s a need for league two style chanting of attack, attack.., attack attack attack, as witnessed from the geordies.
Finally, all the young lads who became STHs when the Amex opened and are now in their late teens and early 20s are spread out across the stadium and probably sit with their families still. They have not been able to congregate together to become a new generation of singers because of the popularity of tickets. It’s very difficult to move seats and find STs together in a group when the window opens.
Well that’s my take on it.
There was a real buzz in the NS concourse pre-match for the Man City game, it was rammed, loads chatting, a few chants were going, quite a long wait time for the beer queue, and it felt really upbeat. You got the sense a lot of people had enjoyed a day of drinking before the game. Alcohol certainly gets the vocal chords going for a match and the atmosphere for that game wasn’t too bad.
Cut to Newcastle and pre-match was distinctly flat. The NS concourse was not that busy, we got our pre-match beers quickly and there was plenty of space to drink them.
So, my hardly empirical take on it is our crowd response is very influenced by how much has been drunk pre-match - probably why away games in London are more raucous as virtually everyone will have travelled on the train and most have had a few to drink.
As others have said, as a crowd we tend to react to events on the pitch. Man City being a recent example where the team played well in the 2nd half and the crowd responded. There wasn’t a great deal to get excited about on Saturday about watching the ball move from side to side and backwards as we tried to find a way to break through a very boring, defensive team. We’re not playing so crap that there’s a need for league two style chanting of attack, attack.., attack attack attack, as witnessed from the geordies.
Finally, all the young lads who became STHs when the Amex opened and are now in their late teens and early 20s are spread out across the stadium and probably sit with their families still. They have not been able to congregate together to become a new generation of singers because of the popularity of tickets. It’s very difficult to move seats and find STs together in a group when the window opens.
Well that’s my take on it.