No, because as you say there were other defenders behind him to cover should his challenge be beaten.
But it was 3 on 3, that would have made it 3 on 2.
You simply don’t do that...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, because as you say there were other defenders behind him to cover should his challenge be beaten.
I realise we're all hurting at the moment, but I found this genuine report on Sat game, on how we may be percieved.
"The hosts make a better start, pushing us onto the back foot. (It’ll become clear that we would’ve been on the back foot anyway, but let’s not spoil the moment.) Will Hughes blocks Burn’s bouncing half-volley, Murray meets a cross but is sufficiently impeded by Kabasele. There are a couple of corners. It’s a flurry rather than a storm, and it’s over in five minutes or so. We deal with it well, calm and diligent in defence, snappy in midfield. The game settles into a pattern from which it’ll never escape, of Brighton having great acres of possession and not really knowing how to harvest it, of Watford suffocating it all by sitting deep and gradually pushing each attack backwards, guiding a toddler out of a toy shop.
It has the dramatic intensity of someone prodding a damp sponge with an old toothbrush.
Thing is, you can see where Graham Potter’s trying to get to. Brighton are comfortable on the ball, and they have a few bright, lightweight players who’d frustrate a pragmatist like Hughton but would excite a coach interested in cultivating something more high-brow. What they don’t have is any kind of cutting edge. There’s the potential for goals from Murray, obviously, but he sits atop all of this like a cat on a Christmas tree; the rest of the team isn’t set up either to supply or support him. We happily force Brighton into wide areas and even when we can’t disrupt their crosses, nobody’s remotely interested in joining Uncle Glenn in the penalty area. It all goes very flat very quickly.
They’re a nice side. Polite, tidy, please, thank you. But you have to think that they’re a sitting duck if anyone in the bottom three ever manages to get their shit together"
https://bhappy.wordpress.com/2020/02/09/brighton-and-hove-albion-1-watford-1-08-02-2020/
Mooy gave it away badly. Duffy shouldve taken a yellow and played both ball and player. You can't just keep backing off
But it was 3 on 3, that would have made it 3 on 2.
You simply don’t do that...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes not in debate - only Mooy’s role.
He’s not experienced at this level nor even the one below. If he was, he’d have a plan to play a team that can get results based on the talent currently here rather than vision to be; which won’t come to pass because relegated managers just don’t tend to get 2nd bites and time to implement plans especially with less money to spend and best players departing. Strikes me as a good solid pro and nice guy. But we’re not after a news reader but a news maker to lead us.
I've just been back and looked at the highlights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpxjHQeLViE
Docoure and a second watford player surrounded by four brighton players. A fifth brighton player is out wide with the even further out wide third watford player. We had them outnumbered, we absolutely had scope for Duffy to make a challenge, and even if he went for the fair challenge instead of the "man and ball" challenge someone mooted above, we still outnumber them if he is unsuccessful. That's the situation in which you do make the challenge.
I don't think Mooy's role is being debated, it's the balance between which cost us more that we disagree on.
Mr Hughton had experience of the Prem and the championship. Just saying.
Football is a mercurial sport. Lots of things have to come together for it to go well on a consistent basis. We're pretty much where I expected to be. I HOPED to be doing much better, but that's the same every season..
I realise we're all hurting at the moment, but I found this genuine report on Sat game, on how we may be percieved.
"The hosts make a better start, pushing us onto the back foot. (It’ll become clear that we would’ve been on the back foot anyway, but let’s not spoil the moment.) Will Hughes blocks Burn’s bouncing half-volley, Murray meets a cross but is sufficiently impeded by Kabasele. There are a couple of corners. It’s a flurry rather than a storm, and it’s over in five minutes or so. We deal with it well, calm and diligent in defence, snappy in midfield. The game settles into a pattern from which it’ll never escape, of Brighton having great acres of possession and not really knowing how to harvest it, of Watford suffocating it all by sitting deep and gradually pushing each attack backwards, guiding a toddler out of a toy shop.
It has the dramatic intensity of someone prodding a damp sponge with an old toothbrush.
Thing is, you can see where Graham Potter’s trying to get to. Brighton are comfortable on the ball, and they have a few bright, lightweight players who’d frustrate a pragmatist like Hughton but would excite a coach interested in cultivating something more high-brow. What they don’t have is any kind of cutting edge. There’s the potential for goals from Murray, obviously, but he sits atop all of this like a cat on a Christmas tree; the rest of the team isn’t set up either to supply or support him. We happily force Brighton into wide areas and even when we can’t disrupt their crosses, nobody’s remotely interested in joining Uncle Glenn in the penalty area. It all goes very flat very quickly.
They’re a nice side. Polite, tidy, please, thank you. But you have to think that they’re a sitting duck if anyone in the bottom three ever manages to get their shit together"
https://bhappy.wordpress.com/2020/02/09/brighton-and-hove-albion-1-watford-1-08-02-2020/
Hughton kept us up for two seasons. Just saying!
Easier said than done when he inherited A) the slowest team in the Premier League & B) a team that has nobody that can unlock a defence.
Makes us unbelievably easy to defend against.
Unfortunately the person that wrote this is spot on, particularly his/her description of us as having a few bright, lightweight players. Teams just simply outmuscle us all over the park and allow us to weave our pretty patterns in our own half and thus to get our possession stats up but to little or no effect. And as the author concludes...but you have to think that they're a sitting duck if anyone in the bottom three ever manages to get their shit together. Depressing.
I'm not saying that Pearson was a genius in the match, just that he got his first team selection spot on, simply playing his best players. We often fail against powerful opponents (Blades, Burnley), and he seemed aware of that. Potter didn't ... keeps tinkering and too many weak 'technicians' in midfield.
Agree with you about Deeney, I put that down to Dunk or Duffy doing a job on him. I expect to be hammered now, as almost everyone seems to hate Duffy with a passion.
Indeed. And I think GP will keep us up too, despite no premier league experience. I also think that GP has greater potential in the modern game, but without results he may not get to achieve that potential.
That’s a brilliant synopsis .... of the first 60 minutes yesterday.
Many of those comments have been made on NSC in the last 24 hours, eg
“nobody’s remotely interested in joining Uncle Glenn in the penalty area”.
“you have to think that they’re a sitting duck if anyone in the bottom three ever manages to get their shit together”.
“What they don’t have is any kind of cutting edge”.
“they have a few bright, lightweight players”.
“Brighton having great acres of possession and not really knowing how to harvest it”.
Ian is very much a 'he'. Lives in Hastings. Knows his football. Definitely a soft spot for the Albion. Very supportive of Fans United back in the day.
We’re Champions League when it comes to passing.
View attachment 120023
Just need a killer instinct in the final third.
Possession is such a dull stat because as we all know, it’s what you do with it that counts. Lies lies and damned lies eh!