GoldWithFalmer
Seaweed! Seaweed!
I think it was if you let us have time on the ball we can hurt you. If you press we do not have a plan B and are not up to much.
The 1st Goall was plan A part 2 subsection 3 moving to plan B
I think it was if you let us have time on the ball we can hurt you. If you press we do not have a plan B and are not up to much.
I think he´s right. If other teams let us play we will dominate them and probably win, even though we still struggle to convert the chances we make.
But more teams are coming up with a plan to stop us playing and we haven´t yet worked out ways to win if they do that successfully.
In my opinion that´s the next step. Gus has said he´s happy as long as he sees us improving, and I´m sure he´s working on that. Once we can develop our normal game so we can unlock teams who try to stop us, and improve our finishing, the future looks very bright indeed.
The theory is you force the ball back to the goalkeeper by pressing on to the wing backs and the other centre back. When the goalkeeper has the ball you then press hard with your strikers marking the centre backs, 2 midfielders on the fullbacks etc meaning the only option is to kick it long. You are right in saying this will leave a man free in an advanced position but it takes an incredible pass to pick him out and plus whilst the ball is in the air you have time to get across and meet it. Being taller than them you will generally win possession this way unless they have a good hold-up player. Obviously you have to be very tactically adept to know when to press and how hard you press and it has to be a whole team effort otherwise you will be picked off very easily.
I think the only way you can overcome teams closing you quickly is for the players around the ball to be quick to offer numerous passing angles to give options for the man on the ball
Pressing us isn't going to make much difference if the centre back can hit a 50 yard pass to an overlapping full back. Exposes the fashionable 'no plan B' phrase for the bullshit it is, bandied around by fans because they've heard people say it on the telly.
Agree with trueblue here - we seem to have developed a long ball options which wasn't used earlier in the season.
How quickly people forget the 50 yard ball to Bridge to knock in for Orlandi to score yesterday. We can, and do mix it up occasionally.
We need more mixing,but as for plan b as others have said the 1st goal was certainly not plan A,that was the 2nd and if we play with tempo and do that more often,we will tear teams apart,if that was in the match later in the day yesterday,in fact they would be raving...
Strachan has previously cast doubts on Rodgers "philosophy" at Liverpool - I think he is doubts managers that get labelled with a football philosophy. For example he noted that Liverpool played the passing game for a long time before Rodgers arrived.
I think Gus is actually quite flexible in his approach as it happens. As long as we have control of the game.
Dinosaur pundit. There was a feature on Liverpool on MOTD earlier in the season and both Hansen and Shearer went to town criticising Joe Allen for playing it short and keeping the ball moving, they then did a love and admirarion piece on Gerrard showing some 50 yard balls, he made about 50% but a few sailed out of play.
There are some people who won't ever want to accept a change in the game and there's nothing wrong with that but the game has changed and there is a whole new outlook on it. It works for us. Watch Newcastle and you're watching disjointed, unco-ordinated play with no control and a reliance on individuals producing.
Pressing us isn't going to make much difference if the centre back can hit a 50 yard pass to an overlapping full back. Exposes the fashionable 'no plan B' phrase for the bullshit it is, bandied around by fans because they've heard people say it on the telly.
We have lost quite a few points this season as our style of play is known and we dont vary it much,Newcastle gave us more scope to keep possession in their half,hope Gus does not feel he can stick to his normal plan as a result of our victory over Newcastle.
EXACTLY
Plan A = retain possession of the ball and work an opening. Exploiting that opening includes the option of a HOLLYWOOD pass as well as an easier ball to someone 10 yards away.
We do mix it up and we did do last season as well. I wish some people would recognise that it's not the style of football that means we haven't scored tons of goals, it's the inept finishing.
I think there is danger on both sides of thinking there is only one way of playing the game. That Gerard pass to Suarez for his second goal the other night was a thing of beauty. Should he have played a short pass to ensure they retained possession ? Really ?
I love the way we play the game - but when the opposition press we do sometimes need to knock the ball into the space their pressing has created. Sometime you really do just need to do what the opposition want the least.
And we also rely on individuals producing. That is the "quality" Gus talks about. They have to know about possession and control of the game - but the players he wants are the ones that can also produce the individual magic.
I would not bracket Strachan with Hansen and Shearer. I saw that exchange about Allen - and it was truly cringe-worthy.
Pressing us isn't going to make much difference if the centre back can hit a 50 yard pass to an overlapping full back. Exposes the fashionable 'no plan B' phrase for the bullshit it is, bandied around by fans because they've heard people say it on the telly.
I don't see it like that.EXACTLY
Plan A = retain possession of the ball and work an opening. Exploiting that opening includes the option of a HOLLYWOOD pass as well as an easier ball to someone 10 yards away.
We do mix it up and we did do last season as well. I wish some people would recognise that it's not the style of football that means we haven't scored tons of goals, it's the inept finishing.