portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,776
Both.I thought it was infrastructure that causes Tony to lose £25m a year and that the players' wages are, relatively speaking, under control by Championship standards. Could be wrong.
Both.I thought it was infrastructure that causes Tony to lose £25m a year and that the players' wages are, relatively speaking, under control by Championship standards. Could be wrong.
The West Ham model seems extremely fan friendly .
If we aspired to WH ticket pricing , aside from their progressive approach to kids STs, if we got promoted then most ST holders would face a substantial increase. They have one lower band (£289). The rest are considerably higher. They also , of course, have a stadium thats double the size so stadium revenue is not as fixed as BHAFC - so more options.
http://seasontickets.whufc.com/pricing
The scheme Bozza highlighted is an impressive bit of tech and something it would be good to see Albion introduce but overall you'd be hard pushed not to miss countless stories in the last year about West Ham with fans being extremely unhappy with the un fan friendly approach of West Ham to segregation, stewarding and the overall migration to their new ground. So unfriendly that the club had to completely overhaul their approach after multiple protests, complaints and incidents. Still want Albion to aspire to that ?
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-stadium-segregation-problems-police-presence
https://www.whufc.com/news/articles/2017/january/23-january/new-stewarding-measures-introduced
I don't think that anyone is arguing that the Albion should be more like West Ham. As far as I can see our club is the most fan friendly and well run it has been in all the time I have been a supporter. .
I find it hard to believe that Ticketmaster are only charging £1.25. They normally charge about 3 times that much for the "admin fees" associated with letting you print your own ticket.
What a brilliant scheme... Absolutely love the bit about the club facilitating the passing on of spare tickets to other non-ST fans and/or those who can't afford to buy them.
West Ham have also announced today their second consecutive freeze (NB defined as no increase) on their season ticket prices. Adults can buy from £289 and U16s for £99.
Just shows what is possible with a bit of imagination and how in the Premier League you do not have to fleece your fans for every penny on ticket prices unless you really want to.
Agree with you to a degree, although TB has paid £140m for the Amex and Lancing, whereas the novelty toy salesmen who own the Hammers are renting the London Stadium (capacity 60,000) for £2.5m a year, after you the taxpayer paid £272million to convert it into a football venue.
They can afford to be generous.
Brighton already has a ticket transfer facility for 1901ers but it's just to send your ticket to a single person I.e. no option to donate it to a pool. It's free as well.
Is it being generous though? Does sharing season tickets REALLY cost the club money? In my experience the only people I know who have used someone else's season ticket are people that are not going to go anyway. They then fill a seat that otherwise wouldn't have been filled, may buy pies, drink, programme, etc and also may start to get the Albion bug and then get a season ticket themselves. I genuinely believe that sharing a season ticket with someone else is a good thing for the club, both financially and morally.
West Ham are being clever and realising it happens anyway and taking a little cut out of it and benefiting charity in the process. We could easily do a bit of that with the right technology. As someone above has said if they charged £5 to transfer (plus an upgrade if applicable) then it would make quite a bit and I think people would still be happy.
At those prices I imagine some just buy them to go and watch the BIG teams. I imagine they get a huge amount of no-shows which has prompted that scheme.
I like it though, would be nice to have something similar, esp donating to those who would normally have no chance of going.
Surely life is bad enough as it without making them turn up to see West Ham get systematically dismantled every other week? Seems cruel.
As someone above has said if they charged £5 to transfer (plus an upgrade if applicable) then it would make quite a bit and I think people would still be happy.
You say that as though you believe it. I call bollocks.
If the club did this, and charged £5, there would be uproar from all of the usual posters who cannot WAIT for any reason to criticise the club - and the demon Barber specifically (ALL 'bad' decisions are his, right?)
There are at least 4 posters on this thread alone who would be queuing up with their accusations of profiteering - "£5 admin fee? They're taking the piss" etc, etc.