Were we Bad

[2 chins]

Were we really that bad or were West ham just to Good

 

[Deanbha]

Were we really that bad or were West ham just to Good

You asked the same question earlier.

 

[Bwian]

For the second time: We were f***ing shite and the blame still lies with Gus.

 

[Wonbrow]

We were shit

 

[Goldstone Rapper]

We played amazingly well. Only problem was that West Ham played super-amazingly well.

 

[Zebedee]

For the second time: We were f***ing shite and the blame still lies with Gus.

You can't say that on here. You'll be sent to the tower. Get back on the Gus bus immediately.

 

[LamieRobertson]

I feel another poll is in the offing..over to u zebedee

 

[Zebedee]

I feel another poll is in the offing..over to u zebedee

One is quite enough for me - at least for today! Gus still has a great deal of support, and rightly so given what we have achieved this year, but there have been some worrying signs about his tactics and team selections, particularly in the last 5-10 games.

 

[LamieRobertson]

One is quite enough for me - at least for today! Gus still has a great deal of support, and rightly so given what we have achieved this year, but there have been some worrying signs about his tactics and team selections, particularly in the last 5-10 games.

Lol@poll....the rest I'll pass on its too late in the day

 

[Rich Suvner]

Physically weak, technically poor, offensively limited.

 

[Zebedee]

Physically weak, technically poor, offensively limited.

A good team selection then?

 

[sir albion]

We had at times 10 players defending most of the time yet westham players had loads of room,that's how bad it was and it really should have been 10 or 12 nil an that's no joke.

 

[making plans for nigel]

Physically weak, technically poor, offensively limited.

Blimey, this ain't the Brighton that Gus created,what's gone wrong?