Aren't the BBC supposed to be unbiased?
Aren't the BBC supposed to be unbiased?
Until their media lovey plays the victim on air. Anyway its good copy for them as it is on all the news wires across the world, great publicity for them.
Good copy would also be tripping him up live on air.
"So Gus, are you saying your representatives did know earlier today? And if so, what did they know and what did they tell you?"
However, Chappers isn't really prepared to probe the egos of the football world for fear of being made persona non gratis himself.
That would have been GREAT copy! but the last point is the problem with sky/BBC/Sun/Argus etc... they do not want to delve and ask to hard a question because they get their stadium access revoked. Much in the Man U / Sir Alex manner. I have felt that Andy Naylor and Brian Owen should have been going at the club since the start of this, doing proper 'exclusives' but didnt because they would be out on their ear.
Aren't the BBC supposed to be unbiased?
It's in the BBC article at http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23022212
"
After the game, the 45-year-old added: "I got an e-mail that I suppose is information at 9:03 and another one from my solicitors; they are now taking care of everything, so I still haven't had a chance to read everything. I can't go into details of the future. It's just a matter of being calm and make sure you make the right decision.
"I've been trying to establish in the last 45 minutes what my rights are now, for example, like, I was saying before, to talk to the players. My situation from 7:30 to now is totally different so I need to inform me well what I can do and what I can't do in the next few days before the appeal is coming.
"From what I read from the statement, I am unemployed, so I suppose [I'm available for new jobs]. My idea now is to appeal and get back to the job I've been doing until 7.30."
"
Hmmm. The BBC have just changed their article. I cut and paste the above a couple of hours ago and it now no longer appears. I'd never accuse the BBC of impartiality (it's ingrained in them to be as neutral as possible and there's huge guidelines about it) but they've removed the admission from Poyet that he did receive an email. THAT is very curious.
Hmmm. The BBC have just changed their article. I cut and paste the above a couple of hours ago and it now no longer appears. I'd never accuse the BBC of impartiality (it's ingrained in them to be as neutral as possible and there's huge guidelines about it) but they've removed the admission from Poyet that he did receive an email. THAT is very curious.
Until their media lovey plays the victim on air. Anyway its good copy for them as it is on all the news wires across the world, great publicity for them.
Good copy would also be tripping him up live on air.
"So Gus, are you saying your representatives did know earlier today? And if so, what did they know and what did they tell you?"
However, Chappers isn't really prepared to probe the egos of the football world for fear of being made persona non gratis himself.