Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Well said Chris Grayling



Anybody who runs a B&B should be able to choose who stays whether on religous or personal belieif. If a person/couple is turned away it's the owner of the B&B who loses out financially. Is it surprising that Lord Mandelson is trying to make a who ha about what Mr Grayling is reported to have said? Would Mandelson have said anything if an unmarried Hetrosexual couple had been denied a room in a B&B ?
 
Last edited:






D

Deleted User X18H

Guest
Anybody who runs a B&B should be able to choose who stays whether on religous or personal belieif. If a person/couple are turned away it's the owner of the B&B who looses out financially. Is it surprising that Lord Mandelson is trying to make a who ha about what Mr Grayling is reported to have said? Would Mandelson have said anything if an unmarried Hetrosexual couple had been denied a room in a B&B ?

Why is it loose though?
 


Goldstone Rapper

Rediffusion PlayerofYear
Jan 19, 2009
14,865
BN3 7DE
Anybody who runs a B&B still has to follow the rule of law. The Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007 clearly states that no one should be refused goods and services on the grounds of their sexuality.

You don't get to be above the law just because you've set up a B&B business!
 


Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,451
Sussex
This is a bollocks arguement really that will have the Activists and no doubt NSC having kittens. What he said is true. Respect a homeowners religious beliefs if the case may be
 




The Merry Prankster

Pactum serva
Aug 19, 2006
5,578
Shoreham Beach
This is a bollocks arguement really that will have the Activists and no doubt NSC having kittens. What he said is true. Respect a homeowners religious beliefs if the case may be

The point is that they are not just home owners - they are offering a public service and therefore are bound by the laws of the land.
 


RexCathedra

Aurea Mediocritas
Jan 14, 2005
3,509
Vacationland
You can discriminate to your heart's content, against anyone on any grounds, right up until the point where you charge money.

You take the King's shilling, you fight the King's war.
 






London Pompous

Active member
Feb 16, 2008
660
He should move to Australia, where no poofters means no poofters.

[yt]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_f_p0CgPeyA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_f_p0CgPeyA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/yt]
 




London Pompous

Active member
Feb 16, 2008
660
It should be down to the owner who stays not some little man in Whitehall

no+irish+no+blacks+no+dogs.jpg
 




Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,451
Sussex
If the owners don't want the risk of having 'undesirables' as customers, then don't open a B&B. Simples.

There are some laws which could reasonably argued against, but this one is not one of those.

Not stritly true, you don't have to be homophobic to not like the sound of 2 men have bum sex all night. Now we all know they are more promiscious than average due to the fact it's 2 men and men always want it. So , based on that then yeah turn them away if you want. Your house , do what you want
 


London Pompous

Active member
Feb 16, 2008
660
Not stritly true, you don't have to be homophobic to not like the sound of 2 men have bum sex all night. Now we all know they are more promiscious than average due to the fact it's 2 men and men always want it. So , based on that then yeah turn them away if you want. Your house , do what you want

What about if they just agree to wank each other off?
 


Brian Fantana

Well-known member
Oct 8, 2006
7,548
In the field
Not stritly true, you don't have to be homophobic to not like the sound of 2 men have bum sex all night. Now we all know they are more promiscious than average due to the fact it's 2 men and men always want it. So , based on that then yeah turn them away if you want. Your house , do what you want

I am not disputing the fact that maybe people would be uncomfortable with gay men having sex in their home, but if that is the case then don't open your home to paying customers. It's fairly simple.

Once you let your home become a place of business, then you do relinquish the right to do what you want in it.
 




Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,451
Sussex
I am not disputing the fact that maybe people would be uncomfortable with gay men having sex in their home, but if that is the case then don't open your home to paying customers. It's fairly simple.

Once you let your home become a place of business, then you do relinquish the right to do what you want in it.

Yeah but you don't, its your home and you have the right to choose how to make an honest buck.

Its not blatant discrimination , just upholding religious beliefs that have existed in mankind for ever
 






on a point of law.. when a shop keeper displays an item for sale he or she is not obliged to sell that item to someone they do not wish to as it is only deemed as an invitation to treat, so if a B&B owner is displaying a room for £50 per night this is only an Invitation to treat. Please explain the difference
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here