- Jan 18, 2009
- 4,885
It’s the most viable option we have unfortunately . You think people putting them up in their houses is the answer? It’s simply not appropriate in the vast majority of cases. Hotels are cheaper than building housing centres. Although I’m not against housing centres if they are fit for purpose and not used as detention centres.
Probably best to do some due diligence when you stay at a hotel. A quick look at Tripadvisor could have saved you a lot of upset.
Of course it’s viable, and more importantly it’s necessary to alleviate the political consequences that are going arise when taxes and the cost of living is going up for U.K. citizens is going up. Putting ever increasing numbers of asylum seekers in Hotels with taxpayers picking up the bill is simply not going to work politically speaking.