Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
We need James Wilson back for the rest of the season.
- Thread starter dangull
- Start date
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
R. Slicker
Well-known member
- Jan 1, 2009
- 4,490
We don't really need him now Baldock is fit.
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
Back for Cardiff ? 
Discodoktor
Active member
Like him lots! Also gives us something else.
durrington gull
Well-known member
Really,!!!
?, but Wilson is a goalscorer unlike Baldock!
Albion Robster
Well-known member
What happens when (if) Murray comes in on loan?
Is it worth sending back Wilson at that point? As we'll have four strikers competing for two places - Hemed, Baldock, Zamora and Murray.
Is it worth sending back Wilson at that point? As we'll have four strikers competing for two places - Hemed, Baldock, Zamora and Murray.
Cowfold Seagull
Fan of the 17 bus
Hey, if United are happy for us to hold onto him, even if he isn't starting too many games, I say let's keep him. It's always best to keep all options open, and I feel we will need him at some point even IF Glen Murray comes in on loan.
Not Andy Naylor
Well-known member
I thought the option was on their side, not ours.
why?
Perkino
Well-known member
- Dec 11, 2009
- 6,053
If we sent Wilson back to Man Utd to accommodate Murray I'd be devastated. We don't need another striker anymore, 4 is enough so unless an injury stay clear of him
Blue Valkyrie
Not seen such Bravery!
No, not worth sending Wilson back at all.
We actually have 3 1/2 strikers ( given that Zamora is basically part-time now ), competing for 3-4 places in the matchday 18.
darkwolf666
Well-known member
I like the idea of a part-time footballer - you know, I can only do Saturdays and Wednesdays, anything else doesn't fit in with my plans
Grombleton
Surrounded by <div>s
- Dec 31, 2011
- 7,356
Or, we could keep him for the rest of the season. Y'know, in case another striker gets injured before the end of the season.
spanish flair
Well-known member
Not the case if want and expect a striker to score goals, Wilson already has a higher strike rate per games started this season.
- Jun 27, 2012
- 14,614
From now to the end of the season we're going to have 4-5 players on every match day who might be fit but won't be able to make the squad.
eg: lets say in a few weeks Baldock, Wilson, Calde, Uwe, Crofts or any other 5 from the 24 might not be making the 18. or Skalak, Goldson, Lua Lua etc.
This doesn't mean they're OFF. This doesn't mean they're not needed. This doesn't mean they're out of favour. This doesn't mean they're GONE. This doesn't mean we should "Send them back".
This means we have a strong squad with 2 players for every position which is what you need to get promoted. And that 22 or 23 etc doesn't fit into 18.
eg: lets say in a few weeks Baldock, Wilson, Calde, Uwe, Crofts or any other 5 from the 24 might not be making the 18. or Skalak, Goldson, Lua Lua etc.
This doesn't mean they're OFF. This doesn't mean they're not needed. This doesn't mean they're out of favour. This doesn't mean they're GONE. This doesn't mean we should "Send them back".
This means we have a strong squad with 2 players for every position which is what you need to get promoted. And that 22 or 23 etc doesn't fit into 18.
ewe2
Well-known member
Look at Murphy's improvement under competition for his place,Will Greer regain his etc etc. IMO we need strikers,not just covering injury but convincing the manager that they just cannot be dropped .We do not have that at the moment.
B.W.
New member
- Jul 5, 2003
- 13,666
You must be joking, surely? We already know Sam B is not up to standard, whereas James W at least has potential.