So even though the majority of UKIP supporters openly admit they are racially prejudice they AREN'T racist? Seems legit.
Brilliant.
So even though the majority of UKIP supporters openly admit they are racially prejudice they AREN'T racist? Seems legit.
It's pretty much impossible to be a state scrounger these days, even if you wanted to be, which most people don't. You have to prove you've been seriously looking for work which can involve, missing meals to be able to afford to get to the interview, only not to even get a reply from the potential employer. Then of course you have work that is only available on paper but goes to the foreign labour gangs. Zero hour contact work becomes available so the unemployment figures can be fiddled but that does not mean you get any work to pay the rent.
You can see why people turn to UKIP.
How many of these jobs would ACTUALLY be taken by British workers and risk their benefits/housing etc? A lot of the jobs that immigrants take would certainly not be taken by people on benefits.
Brilliant.
Has anyone excused it then ?
If you are sitting at home watching anything, it might be because you can't get outside due to a disability.If youre sitting at home watching Jeremy Kyle..well..
How many immigrants being drafted in currently?
I know a guy here trying to get a visa for the UK, and its taking weeks, with no conclusion, and no end in sight. Its not as easy as people seem to imagine.
A lot of the immigrants are not particularly looking to travel to England anyway. Most going to Germany, Italy and France, but currently how many immigrants
are swamping the UK? There must be some credible links somewhere.
Yeah well if that's remotely true that would put me off UKIP big time but remember that nasty 'joke' by the Tory MP about the Chinese cockle pickers who drowned at Morecambe Bay.The article says "A Ukip candidate has mocked the victims of the Mediterranean migration crisis by retweeting a sickening post on Twitter."
Is that definitely what he's done? Was he definitely aware of the victims? The picture he retweeted said "Labour's new floating voters. Coming to a country near you soon". Is it possible that he was just being very stupid, as opposed to actually mocking those that have died? Honest question.
If youre sitting at home watching Jeremy Kyle..well..
How many immigrants being drafted in currently?
I know a guy here trying to get a visa for the UK, and its taking weeks, with no conclusion, and no end in sight. Its not as easy as people seem to imagine.
A lot of the immigrants are not particularly looking to travel to England anyway. Most going to Germany, Italy and France, but currently how many immigrants
are swamping the UK? There must be some credible links somewhere.
Net immigration to this country last year was 250 000+ but you knew that right ?
The article says "A Ukip candidate has mocked the victims of the Mediterranean migration crisis by retweeting a sickening post on Twitter."
Is that definitely what he's done? Was he definitely aware of the victims? The picture he retweeted said "Labour's new floating voters. Coming to a country near you soon". Is it possible that he was just being very stupid, as opposed to actually mocking those that have died? Honest question.
No, I quite agree. But I'd like to know if he's just a typical stupid UKIP candidate, or if he really was mocking those that died, which is even worse than being a typical UKIP candidate.Very stupid or mocking those that died, either way, not the sort of chap with the judgement required to serve as a public official.
You didn't mean creditable and well you know it. Creditable means deserving of commercial praise , you meant that did you? As I said that's not the word. You meant credible. I understand you and your chums have jumped all over it but you all know, as do I that it was you that fouled here not me. Sorry, you haven't proved anything. Well, maybe one thing eh ;-)
Still not sure your posts are credible(believable).....However I do agree that I have proved nothing......I do think I know the difference between the two words however proof needs a lot more than a few posts...Am I right to assume or presume(either word will do) that a Chum in your dictionary is someone who agrees with you...Normally "Chum" is used for someone you know and are friendly with...you however seem to know different.
You alright darling? You seem a bit flustered.Utter bollocks - you said it wasn't A word - i.e. it doesn't exist, it's made up. You're now back tracking saying you said it wasn't the word - i.e. he used the wrong word. If you're going to act like a pratish word policeman you might do well to get your posts correct first.
Did I type A? I meant the. For that I'll apologise.
Still not sure your posts are credible(believable)....However I do agree that I have proved nothing......I do think I know the difference between the two words however proof needs a lot more than a few posts...Am I right to assume or presume(either word will do) that a Chum in your dictionary is someone who agrees with you...Normally "Chum" is used for someone you know and are friendly with...you however seem to know different.
I don't know what you are babbling about.
Bet most of them can spell incredibly though.The party and their supporters are to a man, racist / incredible stupid / unbelievably naive / all of the above.
No, I quite agree. But I'd like to know if he's just a typical stupid UKIP candidate, or if he really was mocking those that died, which is even worse than being a typical UKIP candidate.