Virgo to replace Murray? Your thoughts...

[Uncle Buck]

Shitty McDonalds as shopping at Holmbush tonight

Well do not have it then.

 

[barney]

How is saying that our first XI is top 3/4 but that our squad as a whole will drag us down a) unfair and b) suggesting that I'm not a Brighton fan? I'd say it's a pretty fair summary that most people would agree with. Go on, do a poll, and ask if our first choice team is QUALITY (everyone will say yes), but that our reserves are largely not good enough (vast majority will say yes).

it's not unfair to say the first point, absolutely not, but you didn't say that in your opinion they are not good enough, did you? you said "idiots" who came in to replace first teamers. who the f*** are you to call them idiots? fair enough, some may not be quality players (anymore, or yet) but you have no right to abuse them.

im not questioning what you claim to be your point but your wording is something that i would expect a brighton fan to be aiming at rivals' players, not our own.

to abuse our own players makes you a prick, in my eyes, a worthless little boy with an opinion too big for his little brain.

disliked by many on here, im sure. and i've heard your name crop up in conversations in the real world too from people associated with the club

utter twat

 

[goldstone]

This is a difficult decision.

On the one hand, why break up a successful central midfield partnership that has brought us two wins and Virgo three goals.

On the other hand, what other striker options do we have?
Jake? No. He has not impressed at all so far this season and we would have no height up front.
OGH? Maybe. At least he would give 100%, but again a height problem if we are to make something of crosses.
Dixon? No. So far he has not shown that he has what is needed for league football.

So that leaves Virgo as the best option for just this one game in my opinion.

 

[barney]

"Idiots" is ABUSE? Christ, you must lead a sheltered life. I think it's fairly obvious what my point was. Maybe not to you though.

And yes, I'm just sure the people involved in the club sit around all day discussing nsc posters.

idiots has no relevance to their footballing ability though does it. in fact, what relevance does it have to anything? it's not f***ing constructive is it? sheltered, no. it was not obvious whatsoever you stupid little boy. to me it looked like another unprovoked attack on our reserve players.

well no i didn't suggest that, i merely pointed out that there are some who dislike you because of your stupid rants and obnoxious ignorance.

 

[barney]

Bugger me. "Idiots" is an unprovoked ATTACK? Are you typing this with a straight face? I know I couldn't. I suggest you have a look at some more threads. You'll be in tears when you read what some people have written about players today. Some of the nasty, nasty people have said they don't think certain players are good enough to play at all. I presume you will want to comment on all of that too?

And if you really expect me to believe anyone with an ounce of importance at a professional football club reads a messageboard and picks out people they like/dislike then you're a mug. Shouldn't they spend more time doing their jobs so that they don't attract criticism in the first place? If you're standing by this rubbish, then tell us all WHO supposedly dislikes me. There aren't many I've criticised so it shouldn't be hard.

well it is though, isn't it? why are they idiots? because YOU, the complete badger, think they are not good enough to play in the first team? i have no qualms with abusing people. for example, you are a cvnt of the highest order. but i have based that on a large number of ridiculous threads you indulge in.

i'm a mug for thinking people look at this am i? i have been told first hand by people, who will remain nameless, that they see what goes on here and how you, yes you, are an undesirable little creature, in their own words. some may have been nasty even. it's not about who you criticise, it is about who you offend.

and i know you'd like to think our players spend 24 hours on the training pitch striving to be the next thierry f***ing henry, but they dont. they do get free time the same as everyone else. hell, i even saw cox robinson and fogden in town earlier.

 

[barney]

The issue is not whether it's right or not to abuse people, it's about what you class as abuse. If someone called me an "idiot" then I've got to say I wouldn't be offended. Maybe it's different for you.

I think the majority of people on this site would agree we're lacking in the 'back-up' department, and there have been a LOT of people who've been a lot more insulting/critical than me. If you want to pick out "idiots" then fine, but it's hardly the crime of the century, especially as it was quite clearly intended in a different way to how you've taken it.

As for people reading this site, I'm sure they do. And I've never suspected our players train 24 hours a day. I doubt they train 3 hours a day to be honest with you. So yes, there would be plenty of time for club people to read this site. What I do not believe is that they would pick out my comments as worse than many other peoples unless they were one of the few targets I've aimed any criticism at. Which, if that's the case, makes it fairly easy to work out who you know/speak to.

i don't disagree that we might be short of one or two players whatsoever. not that many people actually personally insult the players as people, rather than footballers though. calling someone shit at football is one thing. insulting them as a human is just not really on.

it is not the most insulting word in the dictionary but any stretch of the imagination but it is still needless abuse directed at our own players where you could have just said you did not rate them enough to warrant first team football.. if you intended it in a different way, type it in a different way. i suppose studying at pompey may not grant you the ability to do that, however

and no, no it does not make it easy to work out who i "know"

edit: that's enough from you, i'm done here

 

[fred]

harty to play up front with fozzy thats a deffo

 

[Da Man Clay]

Didn't think this thread could have got much more ridiculous than it had earlier, how mistaken I was. Least i've discovered that idiot is one of the worst insults around I guess.

For what its worth I think most of the back ups we have would struggle to get into a League 2 side.

 

[barney]

not passed me by in the slightest, hence me suggesting you had worded it wrongly.

yes i am a pervert. and yes, i also lie about knowing players because that would make me really cool

but if you re-read a post of mine, it says it's not about who you criticise, it is about who you offend, two entirely different things.

 

[Vatican Citys No.2 Keeper]

Come up with a better suggestion then (that doesn't involve Tommy Fraser in midfield!).

Mayo in midfield

well its not fraser...............

*getscoat*

 

[Tom Hark Preston Park]

This is a difficult decision.

On the one hand, why break up a successful central midfield partnership that has brought us two wins and Virgo three goals.

On the other hand, what other striker options do we have?
Jake? No. He has not impressed at all so far this season and we would have no height up front.
OGH? Maybe. At least he would give 100%, but again a height problem if we are to make something of crosses.
Dixon? No. So far he has not shown that he has what is needed for league football.

So that leaves Virgo as the best option for just this one game in my opinion.

Jake? Why not? Plenty people saying it's his make or break season, just like they say every season. Should play a part tomorrow.

OGH? Got to figure someplace somehow to justify his further contract. Why not tomorrow?

Dixon? Hard to see how he could make any kind of positive contribution to the first team. Ever

Yup, we're more than a tad short of meaningful options upfront.

4-5-1 at home anyone?

 

[Skaville]

Binfest anyone?

 

[Jimmy Grimble]

Binfest anyone?

Good stuff 'ent it?

 

[Skaville]

Good stuff 'ent it?

Such irresponsible behaviour from the BBC. They come on here with their provocative questions and now we have a whole host of posters at loggerheads. I've a good mind to stop paying my licence fee. I'll be writing to Points of View, that's for sure.