Veltman is a better defender but not as good attacking as lamps .
Veltman. Lamptey always looks like he’s just stepped up a level and isn’t sure what to do.Veltman. Sadly it seems Lamptey will not be able to recover his explosive pace that he had before his serious hamstring injury, that kept him out for quite a while.
I get this but in terms of balance and solidity I know where I stand.Weird as they normally play the same position but find comparing the two totally unfair / hard. They both have different qualities and are both very good!
Simple really. Totally depends on the oppo/game situation- it’s not a question of one better than the other, both are good.Veltman is a better defender but not as good attacking as lamps .
Yeh I’m probably with you. But sometimes against lower opposition Lamptey is a great option!I get this but in terms of balance and solidity I know where I stand.
simple really. though this leads to a conclusion Lampty is best as wingback with a back 3.Veltman is a better defender but not as good attacking as lamps .
Exactly. One is a full international mega-experienced less-than-a-million pounds phenomenon and the other is a young bloke, full international who is still learning his trade. Also worth remembering that Lamps is now playing for a coach where the ball produces the pace (listen to Lallana) and any supposed diminishing of his hamstring strength shouldn’t be a huge problem.Why can’t we just love both of them ?
I do.
Velters for his calm demeanour and streak of class and Lamptey for his playground football loving gung-ho madness… coats for goalposts and never ending arguments about where the imaginary crossbar actually is.