Lord Bracknell
On fire
How many 40 over county games have there EVER been where the team batting second scored more than 325 and won?
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Unicorns v Sussex - Arundel - CB40.
- Thread starter Paxton Dazo
- Start date
The Ringleader Returns!
Banned
WJ Durston 117 off 68 balls. 
Barrel of Fun
Abort, retry, fail
It can't be many! We've obviously got a problem with 325 as I am sure that is what we posted when we lost the Natwest Trophy in 1993.
I thought that this one might have been one of them, but the second batting team lost and it was 50 overs.
4th Round: Surrey v Glamorgan at The Oval, Jun 19, 2002 | Cricket Scorecard | Cricinfo.com
Gerbil
Nsc's most loved
What the f***!
Barrel of Fun
Abort, retry, fail
WJ Durston 117 off 68 balls.
Interesting that he has ended up at the Unicorns. His career record is quite good.
Wes Durston | Cricket Players and Officials | Cricinfo.com
Gerbil
Nsc's most loved
He played for Somerset in t20 champions league when Trescothic went head mental again and did fairly well. He's the only one of the unicorns that i've heard of.
Last edited:
Paxton Dazo
Up The Spurs.
- Mar 11, 2007
- 9,719
- Thread starter
- #67
Couldn't agree more - I said at the start the only player I'd be worried about is Durston...why the f*** is he 'club-less' ?!
Not being able to defend 325.
Bounce back with a win against Gloucestershire/Worcestershire (I forget which one) midweek, in the 4-dayers to knock the Welsh off the top.
Lord Bracknell
On fire
The answer appears to be that this is the first ever occurrence:-
Durston ton sets up Unicorns' record chase | Clydesdale Bank 40 round-up Report | Cricket News | Cricinfo.com
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
We've lost, Congrats to the positive gang, you succeeded.
yeah, you're SPOT on
obviously the sussex players thought "oh, its ok, everyone is being positive on that north stand chat thing so we can go easy and lose the game"
get a grip
Withdean Wanderer
Banned
Should have done the decent thing and told Arafat where to go.
As for the rest of them - jokers, absolute jokers.
As for the rest of them - jokers, absolute jokers.
The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,401
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
Because I was really being serious weren't I....
thats the problem with this negativity - there is NOTHING serious about it
today has been nothing short of a f***ing disgrace. losing when defending a 300 plus score against a team of players not good enough to secure county contracts is just unacceptable
but, yeah, lets make a big joke out of it and not worry. if they keep performing like that they'll win f*** all in one day cricket this year
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
twice now our blinded loyalty has seen us lose old baldy for poorer players
The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,401
What happened to Naved?
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
arafat is back
The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,401
Can't we get keep Naved? 
Basically we abandoned Naved for Arafat.
Basically we abandoned Naved for Arafat.
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
Can't we get keep Naved?
Basically we abandoned Naved for Arafat.
oversears player rules innit
The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,401
I know but Naved was doing quite well (Or did he have to go?), I don't mind Arafat but he does bowl some utter tripe sometimes.
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
rana was only ever signed as vocer while arafat was away on international duty
i would rather we had let arafat go and signed rana permanently. unfortunately though, they seem to make decisions based as much on emotional reasons as cricketing reasons