But they don't live in London, it's not imposed on them. If you live in Dartford you only have to pay a ULEZ fee if you travel into the ULEZ zone. It is their choice to drive into the London area with non-ULEZ compliant cars.it would follow that those living in Dartford shouldnt have ULEZ imposed on them, right? because that's whats getting the locals upset, they have shops, schools, GPs etc to get to just the otherside of the line. it may well be popular in the central London borough's where there is indeed low car use, the outer London and bordering counties support isn't so great.
If they have an issue with a lack of services available to them in Dartford, like shops, schools and GPs then maybe that's the issue their MP should be tackling instead of trying to overturn a majority favourable scheme in a different county.
The residents of Dartford may dislike ULEZ as a concept, but to say it is imposed on them is untrue. They can choose to live their lives driving non-ULEZ compliant cars without taking them into London, OR they can pay a very low fee to enter the zone for a day, OR they can get a ULEZ compliant car. I think it is disingenuous to believe that the people who cannot do any of those things are numerous, and that their inability to do any of those three things are more valid than the views or the health of the majority of people the ULEZ directly effects.