The Spanish
Well-known member
your sig is so appropriate to the post above it its brilliant.
UKIP Foster Parents
- Thread starter User removed 4
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
your sig is so appropriate to the post above it its brilliant.
Congratulations! You have a fine future as a political analyst!
Remarkable! Believe it or not I have met a couple of dim labour voters, so they're all obviously unintelligent, and I've even met tories who were thick as sh*t, so that proves that they must all be thick too, doesn't it................
ruready2roll
New member
- Nov 24, 2012
- 2
Cant believe whats happening in our country - they should be sacked for making this decision
I will be voting UKIP as its the only party that will get us out of Europe and stop the influx of immigrants - one British job going to an Eastern European is too many; 2 million is completely unacceptable
And why are we getting EU Migrants children in our system to be fostered in the first place - they need to be placed in the country where they come from
I will be voting UKIP as its the only party that will get us out of Europe and stop the influx of immigrants - one British job going to an Eastern European is too many; 2 million is completely unacceptable
And why are we getting EU Migrants children in our system to be fostered in the first place - they need to be placed in the country where they come from
Bevendean Hillbilly
New member
Bevendean Hillbilly
New member
I prefer ignorant rather than thick. There is a clear distinction in my mind.
D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
That is your opinion, but your completely wrong. Please tell me how UKIP is the same as BNP?
Nibble
New member
- Jan 3, 2007
- 19,238
You're quite right. I'll put it another way: I was in a position to see how UKIP members operate during an election campaign and the night of the vote count and if the behaviour of the various members of UKIP I met is an indicator of the way UKIP operate then it did not give a very good impression.
They both are single policy parties.
They both have a zero understanding of the economy.
Nibble
New member
- Jan 3, 2007
- 19,238
I'm not saying other parties have done a great job of the economy but this is true, they have a very poor grasp of what makes a country's economy run. Okay, the Tory's and Labour f***ed it up through greed and shortsightedness but they did understand it. UKIP would basically get into power, enforce their 5 year embargo and all that gubbins then when all the fuss from that died down they would be left scratching their heads as the population got more and more frustrated.
Yes, the bUshy's of this world would be delighted but the average man on the street would see his personal finances take evn more of a hit than they are already. It would, I predict, be an unmitigated disaster.
Dandyman
In London village.
OK, let's summarise UKIPs immigration policy - it should be controlled from both outside the EU and within the EU. Almost exactly the same policy as the USA, Canada and Australia to name but a few. Yet because UKIP suggest it then it's somehow racist
UKIP's policies are here: Immigration and Asylum: UKIP Policy - UK Independence Party and include jailing those fleeing persecution and torture, exiting the EU and removing the residency rights of EU citizens, discriminating against working class migrants, removing any human rights protection for UK citizens and residents and a variety of other Monday Club frothing at the mouth nonsense.
They are a legal party and people are free to support and vote for them. The rest of us are equally free to regard them as repellent far right racist nut jobs.
If you take a look at the UKIP tax policy it is:
1: Merge income tax and NI. Whilst this has some merit, it would not significantly reduce the quantum of tax legislation that exists in the UK. It would also mean that over 65's pay at 31% rather than the 20% they currently earn (as they are exempt from NI).
2: Abolish higher rate tax. UKIP claim that it is not a revenue earner, but there is no evidence to back their claims. Whilst there is some credence to the disincentive effect at 50%, which tends to put off more talented individuals coming to work in the UK (not that UKIP would let them in in the first place), the 40% band is generally accepted and does raise revenue.
3: Scrap employers NI, this brought in approximately £50 billion last year, UKIP have no explanation as to how this would be replaced, beyond a bland and zero researched claim that there will be more jobs as a result.
Simplistic policies for simple minds. Their policies fail at even a cursory level of being scrutinised.
1: Merge income tax and NI. Whilst this has some merit, it would not significantly reduce the quantum of tax legislation that exists in the UK. It would also mean that over 65's pay at 31% rather than the 20% they currently earn (as they are exempt from NI).
2: Abolish higher rate tax. UKIP claim that it is not a revenue earner, but there is no evidence to back their claims. Whilst there is some credence to the disincentive effect at 50%, which tends to put off more talented individuals coming to work in the UK (not that UKIP would let them in in the first place), the 40% band is generally accepted and does raise revenue.
3: Scrap employers NI, this brought in approximately £50 billion last year, UKIP have no explanation as to how this would be replaced, beyond a bland and zero researched claim that there will be more jobs as a result.
Simplistic policies for simple minds. Their policies fail at even a cursory level of being scrutinised.
Typical left wing case of reading what is actually said, taking it to an extreme and that claiming it as fact.
I've met ignorant tories, as well - I just didn't want to mane my post any longer!
D
Deleted member 22389
Guest
I think it was on Channel 4 last week they mentioned that last year 600,000 entered this country to live and work. That's a lot of people. My concern is how is this country going to cope in the future. How is this going to effects our jobs, housing, schools, NHS and other services. We need to be sensible.
Not everyone is going to get a job and not everyone can afford to live. So what happens then? They join the rest of the people in this country already on some sort of benefit. It's a lose lose situation all around. We pay money to Europe, what exactly are we paying for?
It doesn't make sense to me any of it. Just feel this country is becoming a lot poorer for it. Nothing wrong with being concerned about my country.
Last edited by a moderator:
Net immigration is running at about 200,000 a year. Can the country 'afford' it, the answer depends on the skills and work ethic of those that come to the country. Recent economic analysis indicates that migrants contribute more to the economy than they consume, so they are in fact subsidising the indigenous population.
The government has set a target of 100,000 a year, as it is a nice round number, apart from that, there is no logic to it.
Don Quixote
Well-known member
- Nov 4, 2008
- 8,362
They are closet racists aren't they? I thought everyone knew that. They are a nothing party with no policies.
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
isn't it about time we left the EU ?
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Pretty pink fairy
Banned
- Jan 30, 2008
- 31,981
this