Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] TV pundits for world cup



medwayseagull reborn

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2022
513
Does anyone else think we have reached a new low from incessant fawning over Messi in Argentinas matches, to " know it all " misery guts Souness, to Hartson and Dublins inane and pointless ramblings. I usually quite like Alex Scott but turning up dressed in a bright orange dress to comment on the Netherlands match and then claiming she hadn't realised it compromised her impartiality. I wonder how much the BBC and ITV have spent on, what seems like, dozens of ex-pros enjoying a jolly to the middle east to add little or nothing to the games themselves
 




Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
Just posted a comment, about the commentary last night, which echoes yours on the Maty Ryan thread.
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
62,763
The Fatherland
We have Basti Schweinstiger and the delightful Esther Sedlaczek as the anchor for games over here. :love:

6340673A-80D4-4990-9D30-8C9BEAE9F8C5.jpeg
 


Greg Bobkin

Silver Seagull
May 22, 2012
16,079
TV football coverage would be, on the whole, far better with punditry. It would also save millions of pounds. But people love the debate/banter/insight that goes with it. And the media companies love it because their content gets repeat plays on social for days afterwards.

There are some good pundits, but majority add very little to the match experience.
 






tigertim68

Well-known member
Sep 3, 2012
2,628
Does anyone else think we have reached a new low from incessant fawning over Messi in Argentinas matches, to " know it all " misery guts Souness, to Hartson and Dublins inane and pointless ramblings. I usually quite like Alex Scott but turning up dressed in a bright orange dress to comment on the Netherlands match and then claiming she hadn't realised it compromised her impartiality. I wonder how much the BBC and ITV have spent on, what seems like, dozens of ex-pros enjoying a jolly to the middle east to add little or nothing to the games themselves
Messi the most over rated footballer of all time
 


























Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,262
Faversham
I think the coverage has been decent. :shrug:

#firstworldproblems
 


dazzer6666

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Mar 27, 2013
55,622
Burgess Hill
TV football coverage would be, on the whole, far better with punditry. It would also save millions of pounds. But people love the debate/banter/insight that goes with it. And the media companies love it because their content gets repeat plays on social for days afterwards.

There are some good pundits, but majority add very little to the match experience.
Did you mean without?
 


Zeberdi

“Vorsprung durch Technik”
NSC Patron
Oct 20, 2022
6,948
But people love the debate/banter/insight that goes with it.
Yes, it really improved my match experience tonight on ITVs coverage of the ENG v SEN to know from Lee Dixon which member of the England team loves drinking Yorkshire tea (Stones) and that the Squad have named a stray cat after David Seaman

WTF!😂
 






GT49er

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Feb 1, 2009
49,194
Gloucester
TV football coverage would be, on the whole, far better with punditry. It would also save millions of pounds. But people love the debate/banter/insight that goes with it. And the media companies love it because their content gets repeat plays on social for days afterwards.

There are some good pundits, but majority add very little to the match experience.
Yes, but the pundits could do just as good (or bad) a job watching it on a big TV somewhere (Sarf Londo, Birmingham, Manchester, Travelodge Luton Airport or wherever) that doesn't involve flying out to Qatar and spending zillions on hotels and expenses.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here