they have no right of entry so unless you invite them in theres nothing they can do
unless they go away and ome back with police and a warrant
... we do not have a tv here that is capable of receiving live broadcast or however they call it and i know we haven't watched live tv for 4 years.
I only got court once years ago, she made me singe up there and then.
a device that is capable is the term i believe. theres a sneaky little use of "live" in there, if you use a VCR, DVD player, sky box like device and watch playback only, or your PC has a TV tuner you still require a licence.
You need a tv license to watch iplayer, so how do they control that?
Not quite, you need a TV licence to watch live broadcasts on pretty much anything that can receive one.
They have very few live programmes on iPlayer.
If you are watching something that isn't on BBC at the same time - you technically don't need one.
You don't need a licence if you don't use any of these devices to watch or record television programmes as they're being shown on TV - for example, if you use your TV only to watch DVDs or play video games, or you only watch programmes on your computer after they have been shown on TV.
no idea but whatever means they do use is highly unreliable. they can charging up to our front door a few weeks ago saying we were watching a tv without a licence and now we're liable for a fine. i said prove it. she couldn't. she said she'd come in and look at our tv receiving equipment. i said you won't. she said i must buy a licence right now otherwise she will file this paperwork and i will get a fine. i said prove the use of a tv here that means we need a licence. she said let me inside and i will. we argued for a while on the doorstep before she realised i wasn't going to back down and wandered off with her clipboard.
i complained about her and it is has now started a whole chain of paperwork from them. we notified them years and years ago we do not have a tv service, we do not watch tv and they refunded us what was already paid for that years licence fee. this is the first time (apart from some stupid letters every so often) they have bothered with us. not sure if she really does have proof that she believes is correct but we do not have a tv here that is capable of receiving live broadcast or however they call it and i know we haven't watched live tv for 4 years. we probably wouldn't have 8 kids if we did have a tv. i am not sure if she had proof that believed was correct or if she was trying her luck. but the powers that be were quick enough to believe me on the phone that we are tv less and need no licence.