It has no bearing on me or 99.999% of people in this country
Where is the counter arguement, the balance
Nor does the royal wedding. Doesn't stop it being plastered all over the front pages every other day.
The counter argument being (presumably) that sexual harassment is OK?
What would you say to a man who took a job as a "host" at an all women's event and was told to he needed to be muscly and attractive, and had to wear particular underwear, and he told you that one of those women held his hand? Or even grabbed his bum?
You would have enough respect for him to know that a) he's not likely to be so naive as to be surprised, and b) he can probably handle it.
How about extending the same respect to women.
Who was sexually harrassed here? At this point I see only one source confirming this, the journalist, hardly a ringing endorsement of events given that she was paid to write the article.
How about they went because there had been reports from previous years of unacceptable sexual harassment, and they wanted to report on the story?I got the impression she took the job for the night as a way of "undercover reporting", i.e. she was after the story.
I'd like to hear from those women who actually took that work honestly, knowing what they were doing, not the journalists who crashed it so they could get offended.
No, because those men don't look unhappy at being groped, they look like they're consenting to having women put their hands on their butts.I hope everyone is just as outraged for these guys and wants to see these women publicly shamed and lose their jobs too, and if not, why not?
Jesus wept, some of the replies on this thread.... incredibly sad that so many on here are living in the dark ages.
Yeah you don't sound in the least bit outraged.
I heard it referred to as, sexual abuse, sexual assault and sexual harassment on the BBC yesterday.
You are refusing to distinguish to the point of dishonesty. They were not "Out at the pub", were they. They were "hostessing", having made sure they were wearing the required underwear.
If that happened to my wife while she was "Out at the pub" yes I'd set the guy straight, as you put it. But if it happened to her while she was hostessing at the Presidents Club, while wearing the required underwear, most of my questions would be for her tbh.
Yes, the only person who has said it was the person who was there. Loads of people who weren't there have said there was no sexual harassment.
You're right, what was I thinking...
As I said before, I watched the original interview, which was edited for the more family orientated early evening news. It was groping, hands up skirts etc.
Exactly.
Good. Well done Fleet Street. Thankfully now it has finished it.
@GT49 The women knew what they were getting into, is just an excuse for lecherous behaviour.
Many snowflakes binding together make an avalanche & change the landscape.
wow....lets turn this into a class war issue.
This wasn't a working mans club and listening to Shelagh Fogarty's programme yesterday the ladies phoning up , some of whom had worked at events like this in the past and at this particular one ,were far from being "poor ". A lot of them who called in were from the escort agency industry and knew that it can get out of hand and in most cases knew that a swift knee to the privates worked..
I am not condoning this in any shape or form however time is moving on and maybe the days of gentlemen's clubs are a thing of the past. Certainly behaviour as to what is acceptable and what is not is changing and for the better, but just reflects what is going on in society.
I wonder what will come next...outlawing lap dancing clubs, "strip joints", that sort of thing. maybe society has moved on so that these establishments are archaic ...after all the propagation of free porn on the internet has taken away the titillation factor which when we were students, the Friday lunchtime "events" at the pub on lewes road, down from college, were heaving with men and young lads
His provocative avatar
Says the idiot with an avatar celebrating an elected politician almost dying in an air accident.
So as a percentage of those in attendance of 500 people, only one has made these accusations, 0.2%. Hmm, exactly, what were you thinking......
How about they went because there had been reports from previous years of unacceptable sexual harassment, and they wanted to report on the story?
No, because those men don't look unhappy at being groped, they look like they're consenting to having women put their hands on their butts.
Can't believe some of the crap I'm reading on this thread from people who seem to think sexual harassment is ok.
How many people who were there have come out and said there was categorically no sexual harassment going on?
Says the idiot with an avatar celebrating an elected politician almost dying in an air accident.
Sexual harrassment is not acceptable and its also subjective. HAS ANYONE OTHER THAN THE JOURNALIST MADE A COMPLAINT OF THIS NATURE AT THIS CHARITY EVENT?