Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Tory party achievements 2010 - 2024











The Antikythera Mechanism

The oldest known computer
NSC Patron
Aug 7, 2003
8,085
He should be clearer but he's right - the government promised they'd fund and build 200,000 "starter homes" over ten years to create affordable housing, of which none have ever been built. They went as far as acquiring some land...which was then used for private housing developments.
Maybe I've been asleep for the last 14 years, but I've never heard of the Government promising to "build" and "fund" new homes. As far as I'm aware, the days of Local Authorities, funding, building (by way of private contractors), owning and renting council houses are a thing of the past, not least because most LA's are verging on bancruptcy.. All new large housing developments must have an element of "Affordable" housing, usually in the region of 40%, either rented or part ownership through Housing Associations. So he's still wrong.
 






Sid and the Sharknados

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 4, 2022
5,694
Darlington
And besides that, wind farms generate very little energy.
Not sure how exactly you intend that to be interpreted.

But on the plus side, while looking this up I found these tracker websites that I could look at ALL DAY.




29.4% of UK generation over 2023, and just over a fifth of UK generation at the time of posting.
 


Peteinblack

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jun 3, 2004
4,135
Bath, Somerset.
Maybe I've been asleep for the last 14 years, but I've never heard of the Government promising to "build" and "fund" new homes. As far as I'm aware, the days of Local Authorities, funding, building (by way of private contractors), owning and renting council houses are a thing of the past, not least because most LA's are verging on bancruptcy.. All new large housing developments must have an element of "Affordable" housing, usually in the region of 40%, either rented or part ownership through Housing Associations. So he's still wrong.
I always wonder what is defined as "affordable" - affordable to who?! People on £25,000 salary or £125,000?

Problem is that building homes for people on low incomes is simply not profitable to private building firms which are naturally only concerned with profit maximisation and increasing shareholder value.

Again, 'the market' does not necessarily serves the interests, or meet the needs, of those on low incomes; they are not deemed to be 'profitable' consumers or customers.
 
Last edited:


Happy Exile

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Apr 19, 2018
2,133
Maybe I've been asleep for the last 14 years, but I've never heard of the Government promising to "build" and "fund" new homes. As far as I'm aware, the days of Local Authorities, funding, building (by way of private contractors), owning and renting council houses are a thing of the past, not least because most LA's are verging on bancruptcy.. All new large housing developments must have an element of "Affordable" housing, usually in the region of 40%, either rented or part ownership through Housing Associations. So he's still wrong.
This has a bit more - I don't know enough about the mechanisms of house building but it does look like the government promised to fund (possibly indirectly) 200,000 new homes but never legislated to make it happen

 




A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,523
Deepest, darkest Sussex
Far be it from me to praise the Tories, but there is one serious answer here that I think we should absolutely give them some credit for

Gay marriage

Would it have been achieved without the Lib Dems in coalition with them? Probably not, but nevertheless it was a bold decision to bring it in
 


The Antikythera Mechanism

The oldest known computer
NSC Patron
Aug 7, 2003
8,085
I always wonder what is defined as "affordable" - affordable to who?! People on £25,000 salary or £125,000?

Problem is that building homes for people on low incomes is simply not profitable to private building firms which are naturally only concerned with profit maximisation and increasing shareholder value.

Again, 'the market' does not necessarily serves the interests, or meet the needs, of those on low incomes; they are not deemed to be 'profitable' consumers of customers.
You're absolutely right, as the term "Affordable" as a rule of thumb is meant to reflect 80% of the market value, which in most areas is beyond the reach of those on lower wages.

The cost of building new homes is not so much in the construction costs as developers pay very low rates to their sub-contractors, but in the cost of the land and the huge profit margins they require. With their profits they buy up land as land banks to use in the future, then inflating prices to profit further from the earlier land purchases.
 


Peteinblack

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jun 3, 2004
4,135
Bath, Somerset.
You're absolutely right, as the term "Affordable" as a rule of thumb is meant to reflect 80% of the market value, which in most areas is beyond the reach of those on lower wages.

The cost of building new homes is not so much in the construction costs as developers pay very low rates to their sub-contractors, but in the cost of the land and the huge profit margins they require. With their profits they buy up land as land banks to use in the future, then inflating prices to profit further from the earlier land purchases.
Yes, a massive site near us - previously a large Homebase store - has been derelict for 3 years. I keep wondering who has bought it, and why they are not developing it. I suspect that they are perfectly happy to leave it empty until land values increase further,

In the meantime, we'll repeatedly be told that the lack of (affordable) housing is due to immigrants!
 




Pavilionaire

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2003
31,262
What are the best achievements of a broken clock?

1. It is right twice a day.
2. It looks like it is working (until you observe it closely for a while and discover it is f*cked).
 


Jul 20, 2003
20,666
Introducing the UK to tractor porn and the practice of sticking your cock in a dead pig's mouth.
 






medwayseagull reborn

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2022
512
Whichever way you look at it, even the most ardent Tory must see that the list is absolutely pathetic for fourteen years of government.
 


nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,571
Gods country fortnightly
Whichever way you look at it, even the most ardent Tory must see that the list is absolutely pathetic for fourteen years of government.
There has been without doubt challenges in the last 14 years, some by global or regional shocks.

IMHO I didn't think 2010-15 was too bad, but instead of building on this in their second term and taking the opportunity to ease austerity they lost their minds choosing to appease the right wing of their party rather than the good of country.

Political stalemate, chaos, mass expulsions and ridiculous leadership followed consumed by populism and nationalism. The end result is the public are very disillusioned with politicians, many of whom lied through their teeth.
 
Last edited:








Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
53,109
Goldstone
I couldn't have named a single good thing they've done in 14 years, but this thread has completely opened my eyes.

I'm switching my vote to Tory.
 


seagullsovergrimsby

#cpfctinpotclub
Aug 21, 2005
43,942
Crap Town
Boris The Liar getting his comeuppance and the subsequent appointment of Liz Truss for 49 days.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here