? ' 'they don't have the numbers' - do they mean the Government don't have the numbers to get it through, or that the 'rebels' don't have the numbers to stop it passing??
Given the context of your previous political comments, I speculate that is another example of your poor skill in the use of irony. Please feel free to endorse with a thumbs up or make out an alternative case if you are willing and able...Sir Starmer has the whole thing covered, next year can't come quickly enough.
And even places like Faversham can go if Lab, Lib and Gren give each other a nod and a wink in some seats. We've seen it in by elections.A Survation poll in The Times last month had this for Faversham and Mid Kent:
Faversham and Mid Kent
Winner: Con
Vote share by party
Con 41.4%
Lab 35.8%
Lib Dem 10.9%
Green 4.3%
SNP 0%
Plaid 0%
Labour set to do better than Blair’s 1997 landslide at next election, poll says
Sir Keir Starmer is on course to win more seats than Tony Blair did in his landslide victory in 1997 despite his party being riven with divisions over whether to back a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas conflict.Labour would win the keys to Downing Street with a 212-seat majority if the general electionwww.thetimes.co.uk
Tory hold due to the vote being split. Some amazing Tory losses elsewhere though if true.
Quote edited by moderator
Did you have any in mind?This has been a particularly toxic and terrible manifestation of tory political governance but I am sure the more balanced Conservative MPs will also suffer at the next election because the ineptitude and mendacity of the last 13 years...
Ok, I am very angry and very sad, but the fact remains, the asylum seeker died in a place where he shouldn't have been in the first place.In due course we will learn about the circumstances of the death and at that time we can make an assessment of whether you are right or not.
Quote edited by moderator
I understand your angerOk, I am very angry and very sad, but the fact remains, the asylum seeker died in a place where he shouldn't have been in the first place.
Local fire services and health officials warned the government, the barge wasn't safe.
Certainly seems to be. What a dreadful piece of messsaging, caused entirely by their own lunacy.Can that really be true?
Well OBVIOUSLY, a minister who will vote with the PM on his flagship Rwanda policy needs to be back in Westminster today.Climate campaigners and politicians have reacted with fury to the news that the UK climate change minister, Graham Stuart, has returned to London from Cop28
Francesca Rhodes, of Care International UK, said: “If the reports are accurate, it is staggering that the UK government has no ministers attending the final critical days of Cop28. These negotiations will decide the fate of millions of people facing floods, fires and famine due to the climate crisis. The UK has played a productive role in the talks so far but leaving early is simply shameful. Time and again, wealthy countries have let down low-income countries. The latest text was deeply disappointing and does not keep 1.5C alive. When the UK should be standing up for marginalised communities, including women and girls