Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,321
Even a huge dent in that number would send a clear message to the Tories that the game is up20k majority, that loseable
Even a huge dent in that number would send a clear message to the Tories that the game is up20k majority, that loseable
This man was our Prime Minister.
I wish someone would just tell him to f*** off during an interview. Or at least call him a bloody disgrace. I know it would be career ending (possibly not) but you’d have to risk it wouldn’t you? If you were interviewing the fool?That's pretty terrible, even by his standards. He's still showing nothing but contempt where he should be respectful, looking around to belittle the interviewer. It’s all just a laugh for him.
I wish someone would just tell him to f*** off during an interview. Or at least call him a bloody disgrace. I know it would be career ending (possibly not) but you’d have to risk it wouldn’t you? I
Eddie Mair came close. He said "you're a nasty piece of work, aren't you?"
People should have paid more attention
Still didn't really get a straight answer out of him though!And, as Eddie Mair showed, it was not hard to pin down the lying, bumbling, incompetent buffoon. Something the vast majority of 'political journalists' seem to have been completely incapable of for the last 7 years. You do have to wonder why
I doubt whether Johnson given a straight answer to anything since nursery ... and I'd have my doubts about thatStill didn't really get a straight answer out of him though!
This should be fun.
E: Just someone dropping some salacious accusations at George the day before his wedding day. Makes grim reading, won't post it here because it's actually just a bit depressing/grim rather than fun.
I'm embarrassed to read that. In my name.Awful ****.
Staff at asylum centre ‘ordered to paint over welcoming pictures for children’
Mr Jenrick wanted it to be made clear the asylum centre was a ‘law enforcement environment’ and ‘not a welcome centre’, it is claimed.www.independent.co.uk
Jenrick has clearly learned nothing. Breathtaking when you think about it..........Awful ****.
Staff at asylum centre ‘ordered to paint over welcoming pictures for children’
Mr Jenrick wanted it to be made clear the asylum centre was a ‘law enforcement environment’ and ‘not a welcome centre’, it is claimed.www.independent.co.uk
How as a human being can you get into a position where you think that making lone, frightened children feel welcome is a bad thing? There will be a special place in hell for him, his colleagues and anyone who defends this.I'm embarrassed to read that. In my name.
This is the sort of scum Jenrick is:
On 14 January 2020, Jenrick approved a £1 billion luxury housing development of 1,500 homes on Westferry Road, Isle of Dogs, proposed by Richard Desmond, a Conservative Party donor and owner of Northern & Shell. A Government planning inspector had advised against permitting the scheme, as it would not deliver enough affordable housing and as the height of the tower would be detrimental to the character of the area.[46] When Jenrick approved the scheme on 14 January, he knew that an approval by that date would enable Desmond to avoid having to pay a council-imposed infrastructure levy of between £30 and £50 million, which could have been used for funding schools and health clinics.[47][48] Tower Hamlets London Borough Council then pursued a judicial review against Jenrick’s decision in the High Court, arguing that it had shown bias towards Desmond. It was also reported that Jenrick had helped Desmond to save an additional £106m by allowing affordable housing at 21%, instead of enforcing the local and London-wide planning policy requirement of 35%.[49][50] This could have resulted in a total discount (and subsequent loss of revenue to the Exchequer) of approximately £150 million.[50]
In May 2020, Jenrick did not contest the judicial review, conceding that his sign-off of the scheme was "unlawful by reason of apparent bias". He also confirmed that his approval had deliberately been issued before the new CIL policy could be adopted. This meant that Jenrick was able to avoid disclosing correspondence relating to the application in open court. His planning permission was quashed by the High Court, which ordered that the matter was to be decided by a different minister.[51]
How as a human being can you get into a position where you think that making lone, frightened children feel welcome is a bad thing? There will be a special place in hell for him, his colleagues and anyone who defends this.
Jenrick has clearly learned nothing. Breathtaking when you think about it..........
"Jenrick is married to Michal Berkner. She is nine years older than Jenrick[97] and is the child of Holocaust survivors.[98] She is an Israeli-born and US educated[99] corporate lawyer who practises mainly in London. The couple have three daughters, whom they are bringing up in the Jewish faith.[2][100][18]"