burnee54
East Upper Hermit
I don't really care, I don't live in the countryside and they don't affect my livelihood in anyway. So I don't see what it has to do with me.
Are you vegan mate?
The British National Party in 2005 advocated:
– Severe cuts in immigration
– Leaving the EU
– Bringing back grammar schools
– Increased military spending
– More “security” and “strong leadership”
– Foreign policy driven by “British national interest” not human rights
– Reduce development aid
Apparently......
I don't really care, I don't live in the countryside and they don't affect my livelihood in anyway. So I don't see what it has to do with me.
To be fair they did go a bit "green" at one point
Aren't about 80%of the population against blood sports? So, it will prove just how democratic thos country really is.
I've said it before and I'll keep saying it. If you vote Tory, you vote for cruelty and abuse of our wildlife. They WILL repeal the Hunting Act and if you vote for them, it will be YOUR fault. Make no mistake, if you are against hunting with dogs, you have to vote against the Tories or you will be responsible for bringing back one of the worst acts of violence and cruelty against animals that this country takes part in. Don't then try to tell other countries about their cruelties; don't tell Spain about bull-fighting; don't tell Korea about farming dogs and boiling them to death; in fact, don't tell anyone about any cruelty because you are the same as them.
No thanks, the 18th century no longer exists
I don't really care, I don't live in the countryside and they don't affect my livelihood in anyway. So I don't see what it has to do with me.
Of course it will use government resources. We can debate how much, but to say it's zero is incorrect.
I don't really care, I don't live in the countryside and they don't affect my livelihood in anyway. So I don't see what it has to do with me.
So this is Corbyn's fault.It's a sign that her Government feel confident enough to put forward all sorts of weird and wonderful legislation because there's no credible opposition.
It's not a paradox, their argument is that chasing foxes around stops them settling and having a family.I love the paradox in the fox hunting argument, " We don't kill many foxes,it's all about the chase"
Then it's" If you ban fox hunting, the countryside will be overrun by foxes"