I guess he'll be visiting other stadiums as well, such as Wembley, The Millenium Stadium, Ibrox, Murrayfield etc
Correct me if I am wrong but this old gent is:
1) An ex member of the Hitler Youth?
2) Has strong homophobic views and is openly vocal with these views?
3) The Head of an organisation that institutionally discriminates against gay rights etc?
4) Has strong Islamophobic views and is openly vocal with these views?
5) the Head of an organisation which has been involved 'institutionally' in the abuse of children and has actively sought to cover up such abuse when it has happened around the world.
6) Unapologetic about point 5 probably for legal reasons.............such is his commitment to repentance.
7) Heads an organisation that is worth literally billions (see also point 6) in art property, stocks, shares and has its own bank, yet remains comfortable to see his 'lambs' live in abject poverty around the globe...............parable with the camel and eye of a needle springs to mind.
8) Makes matters worse for those in 7) by letting them f*** themselves into greater poverty, misery and disease by not sanctioning contraception.
Sounds a right 21st century guy................if the UK are not allowing US shock jocks and democratically elected Dutch politicians who we disagree with, who the f*** decided to let this mad c*nt in the country?
Personally I would chuck him in the oven................no offence like...............I am ex-Newman.
And of course saying art is 'worth millions' completely misses the point of the art in the first place. It was not commissioned to be sold on, it was mostly commissioned to enhance worship. Saying it is 'worth millions' is to treat worship as a commodity, which it is not. It just happens that it is so well done that people are prepared to pay millions for some of it. Treating it as being worth millions would be putting mammon ahead of God by reducing a worship aid into merely a material thing.
A lot of the wealth also comes from property values, but in truth many of the properties are actually a day-to-day liability if you think of them in monetary terms, due to exorbitant heating and maintenance costs, etc.
Still, nice to see another thread where the bigots are happy to trot out all the negatives without acknowledging any of the positives.
Not that I'm a Catholic or anything. But fair's fair.
1. Yes, it would have taken an incredibly brave teenager not to have been.
2. Catholic teaching may be backward (in my opinion) regarding homosexuality, but is very anti-homphobic
3. Wouldn't necessarily argue with that
4. Doesn't at all. Was misquoted and has done a lot since then to make amends for said mistake.
5. Certain individuals within the church have taken part in such horrendous activities. I would say its wrong to label this with the church as an organisation - could easily throw such a generalising label at scouts, Church of England, schools etc...
6. Not true (not that it makes it better)
7. I agree in principle with you, but don't underestimate the work the Catholic church does against poverty.
8. Doesn't sanction contraception, but doesn't sanction sex at all if there is risk of infection. If you are going to break one rule, why not both?
1) An ex member of the Hitler Youth?
2) Has strong homophobic views and is openly vocal with these views?
3) The Head of an organisation that institutionally discriminates against gay rights etc?
4) Has strong Islamophobic views and is openly vocal with these views?
5) the Head of an organisation which has been involved 'institutionally' in the abuse of children and has actively sought to cover up such abuse when it has happened around the world.
6) Unapologetic about point 5 probably for legal reasons.............such is his commitment to repentance.
7) Heads an organisation that is worth literally billions (see also point 6) in art property, stocks, shares and has its own bank, yet remains comfortable to see his 'lambs' live in abject poverty around the globe...............parable with the camel and eye of a needle springs to mind.
8) Makes matters worse for those in 7) by letting them f*** themselves into greater poverty, misery and disease by not sanctioning contraception.
Sounds a right 21st century guy................if the UK are not allowing US shock jocks and democratically elected Dutch politicians who we disagree with, who the f*** decided to let this mad c*nt in the country?
Personally I would chuck him in the oven................no offence like...............I am ex-Newman.
1) Well he would earn more respect if he had have been brave and not a coward, teenager or not. A lot of Nazi sympathisers’ had their epiphany moments during the last days of WW2; better a Russki on top than a Yank overhead as the German ladies used to say. Anyway its a delicious irony that an ex member of the Hitler Youth now fronts up an organisation that allowed its diplomatic channels to be used to spirit Nazis away from Europe to South America and escape justice. Just another shameful episode in the Catholic Church’s long dark history I am sure you will agree?
BROMBERG MASSACRES (September, 1939)
The most victimized class of Polish society was the clergy. In Pomerania, only 20 of its 650 priests were allowed to remain, the rest were either shot or sent to concentration camps. In Wroclaw, 49% of its priests were killed. In Chelmno, 48%, Lodz, 37% and Poznan, 31%. In Warsaw 212 priests died at the hands of the invaders[/B].
Of the 9,700 Jews in Rome, 1,007 had been shipped to Auschwitz. The rest were hidden, 5,000 of them by the official Church - 3,000 in Castel Gandolfo, 200 or 400 (estimates vary) as "members" of the Palatine Guard and some 1,500 in monasteries, convents and colleges. The remaining 3,700 were hidden in private homes.
1/ " The English royal families relatives started a war"
2/ "Your own government has done the very same thing"
You have a real problem with Britain or England dont you ! Why ? and why come on an English message board if at every opportunity you have a dig !!
I think you will find Our & your royal family have started several wars over the years !! And so have countless other royal familes throughout the world so why just single us out again ?
Come on cut us some slack Tyrone, People like yourself are the reason why we as a nation are constantly looking back when we should be proud of our history and be more positive. As you say No country or Race is better than another and they have all committed atrocities of somekind at somepoint.
Get him down to Lewes on November 5th
You're the brave one sitting at your computer pontificating and calling others cowards.
Like at 15-18 you would have stood up to the Nazi war machine if it was all around you.
You are awesome at sweeping statements.
But just to show you for the uninformed person you are.
This kind of situation happend quite alot in Eastern Europe.
So as you see there were far more clergy standing up to the Nazis than supporting it.
Read up on people like this so you aren't so ignornant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsignor_Hugh_O%27Flaherty
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Andr%C3%A9
Pietro Palazzini - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Borkowska_(Sister_Bertranda)
Alfred Delp - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pierre-Marie Gerlier - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Elisabeth Hesselblad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jean-Baptiste Janssens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I can go on and on with clergy who contradict your views.
Your overall general knowledge is quite poor and anecdotal.
You seem happier to portray a small part of a picture rather than the larger one.
BURN HIM
P.S. totally agree with Cunning Fergus
p.p.s. Anyone who wants to know about the Vatican and the Nazis should read this:
Amazon.com: Hitler's Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII (9780670886937): John Cornwell: Books
I have a genuine question for any Catholics on NSC. I went to Catholic school from the ages of 4-18, and went to church most sundays(or saturdays) up to the age of my confirmation at 14. None of that was through choice, admittedly, but still it's plenty of time to learn about Catholicism. Anyway, I read something the other day that somewhat surprised me and showed how little I paid attention/poorly taught I was. It was about the Eucharist. When the priest held up the wafer and wine and said that it's the body and blood of Christ, I always thought that it was a symbolic moment but apparently Catholics genuinely believe that it's become the body and blood of Christ. Is that right? Do all Catholics really believe that? Apparently it's one of the central tenets of catholic belief. I had no idea I was supposed to believe that it actually became Jesus's body and blood.
THE POPE IS COMING??!!
Lock up your children, NOW!
Lock up your Jews more like! If he's doing a nationwide stadium tour I'm sure he'll get a rousing reception at White Hart Lane.
:mendoza: