The Poll: Jim Gannon vs Paul Ince

[Silent Bob]

I would be ecstatic if we got either of them.

 

[surrey jim]

Gannon 92
Ince 53
Fence 17

 

[O Lads]

Where's the 'they're both too good for us, so neither of them will join us' option?

 

[Gull face]

It has to be Ince

Having followed lower division football for too long now, one thing I know is that Gannon is a moody prat. Ince has had a lot of success at this level, he's ambitious and could take us a long way, he won't make the mistake of going too high too soon again and he'll have learnt from his Blackburn experience, he'll also help to shift a few season tickets.

 

[Steve Foster]

Has to be Ince if only to flush away our minority BNP 'so called fans'

 

[1066familyman]

same. if it was between those two then ince. I think there is a stupid lack of black managers in the football league and this should be addressed. Also more players would come to a team ran by paul ince than jim Gannon.

Are you suggesting we appoint a manager on the basis of addressing the lack of black managers in the football league ?

f*** what colour the next manager is - can he do a job is all I want to know.

 

[1066familyman]

Where's the 'they're both too good for us, so neither of them will join us' option?

Sadly I tend to agree with this. Would be nice to be proved wrong though.

I think Ince is most likely to go back into management at Championship level and apart from Stockport's apparent financial troubles, I wonder why Gannon would want to leave for a club in a relegation battle in the same division he's currently in ? They also have a 5yr plan at Stockport to get into The Championship that he might just like to see through at the club where the fans love him.

If I had to choose between the two though I would prefer Gannon.

 

[portlock seagull]

Gannon.

Ince is too likely to be off at the slightest "anybody above Brighton wanna give me a 2nd go?" and though he did well at Macclesfield, I can't help feeling his success at MK was entirely down to being bank-rolled by Pete Waterman and co board members; and a new stadium. Think he'd struggle with us.

 

[Spearritt of the Albion]

I have one problem with Jim Gannon. His name sounds far too much like the former Pala**e defender of the 70s and 80s. I can't even type his name out for fear of giving my compute a virus!

 

[SirDouglasLoft]

That first picture of Ince is amazinghe gets my vote, just for that.

 

[Gull face]

What we mustn't lose sight of here is Ince is the better more inspirational manager who can attract players and Gannon is a bit of a nob.

 

[Bwian]

Where's the 'they're both too good for us, so neither of them will join us' option?

Why too good for us?

You can guarantee that there will have been 40 to 50 applications sent to the club which would suggest that we are still a club people want to manage.

Even more so now with Falmer on the horizon.

 

[Marshy]

what we mustn't lose sight of here is ince is the better more inspirational manager who can attract players and gannon is a bit of a nob.

finally a sensible comment

 

[CHAPPERS]

Gannon.

Over the past few seasons he's turned Stockport around from nearly being relegated out of the entire league to the top half of this division on f*** all money. He's got his pro licence and clearly knows his stuff. Get him in.

 

[Icy Gull]

I don't reckon it's gonna be either of them.

 

[perth seagull]

I'd prefer Ince, with Gannon as his assistant.