Would this be the case I think it is? Happened about 8.25 years ago?
Sent from my phone cause I can
I thought speculation was banned for good reason.
Would this be the case I think it is? Happened about 8.25 years ago?
Sent from my phone cause I can
moronic
Indeed.I thought speculation was banned for good reason.
I thought speculation was banned for good reason.
The Sun got into trouble naming the bloke in the Joanna Yeates case, what is the difference with what the Argus have done? I can't remember what the Sun headline was, but the way the Argus front page looks, it does imply they are guilty by association.
I wonder why it took so long to identify them. Dunk has hardly been out of headlines on the back of the Argus. The others probably harder to identify (with the exception Elphick) but identify one, could have worked from that?
If you provide a false statement under a caution then you are guilty of perjury and perverting the course of justice. If you only volunteered the information then you can easily claim that you simply made a mistake and had a lapse of memory.
It certainly has.
Could I suggest that we all take a copy of today's Argus (or any Argus for that matter) to the Newcastle game, tear it up into strips, and give the Team a ticker tape welcome as they come onto the field - as a fans protest against the Argus's gutter-press sensationalist reporting in this matter.
The Argus report is factually correct. Tommy Elphick was arrested. As I posted on another thread yesterday, people can be arrested for all sorts of reasons. Being arrested does not automatically imply that you are even under suspicion for committing a crime. You can be arrested "to help the police with their enquiries". And that sometimes means EXACTLY what it says.
Sometimes, there is an ADVANTAGE in being arrested. It means that you are entitled to the support of a solicitor, while the police interview you. This can be very helpful.
The problem is that the average reader of the Argus doesn't understand this. I suspect that the average journalist on the Argus doesn't understand it either. People assume that an arrest MUST mean that you are being accused of committing a crime. And then the speculation runs wild.
Even the "innocent until proved guilty" argument falls into this trap. As things stand, there is no verifiable assertion from anyone that Tommy Elphick has even been suspected of committing a crime. ALL that we know is that he was arrested, that he was co-operative, that he is no longer of interest in this enquiry, and no further action will be taken against him.
Why arrest him in the first place? Why not ask him to help with inquires...
Must be a bit embarrassing for the police as well. It has taken them 6 months to find 6 football players from Brighton, and within 24 hours of being arrested (but not charged) one of them is released.
liking that idea
liking it too - any old argus would do, don't wanna be buying them if we can help it