London Irish
Well-known member
Sorry, but that's plainly bollocks.
If there was no intent to pop at / belittle the contribution of Bloom, there is no way he'd have worded his comparison the way he did - "replaced the passion and commitment of Knight, with the money of Tony Bloom". But then you knew that, anyway.
Pretty much everybody at this stage is at least questioning Bloom's decision to persevere with Sami - that doesn't mean they are 'lickers' for pulling up the ungrateful snides choosing to attack his character or commitment to the club.
Correcting that slight, is all most on this thread are 'guilty' of. As you'll see from my response, I was quite clear that this was the ONLY part of Attilla's post that I didn't agree with.
But stating a preference for Knight isn't necessarily belittling Bloom is it? It's the mentality that takes this as a personal slight against Bloom that I find questionable.
You are entitled to find Bloom more passionate than Knight if you like or about the same - I don't think you'll find Attila having a pop at you for that. I would say try and be as liberal and generous to his views. He is trying to seperate his broad critique of money in football from Bloom the fan as much as he can from what I read - but obviously you can only take that so far - and having a debate on that shouldn't be personal.