The Denver killer is clearly a very very sick young Man.

[beorhthelm]

Here's a great conspiracy theory I just found, apparently this tragic shooting is paving the way to World War 3

this type of theorising was doing the rounds with in minutes of the shooting. apparently the powers that are in charge cant do anything without creating a "false flag" to justify their action to take over power (...which they already have. no i dont understand either). but thats another binfest.

 

[brunswick]

Just out of curiosity, are any of these future posts likely to be about football or the Albion, or will you be staying solely on the conspiracy stuff?

i only come on here to post and read about the seagulls, but when i see threads that "i feel" are way off from what "i feel" is really going on, i feel compelled to post.

you could just not post conspiracy rubbish, theres plenty of other forums for it. this one certainly doesnt need monologues on posters martyrdom.

one mans conspiracy rubbish is another mans truth, another mans mainstream media is another mans rubbish.....subjectivity.

What always makes me chuckle about [MENTION=2850]brunswick[/MENTION] conspiracy theories, is that they place great credit on the ability of the US government & it's agencies to carry out immensely complex and sophisticated operations, that deceive the world at large, and manipulate situations to their own end. The real implausibility of these claims is to imagine that these agencies and government have the competence, the coordination, and the intelligence to carry out even half of what they supposedly do. I suspect most of the US agencies would be to some degree flattered people consider that they are capable of undertaking such ambitious operations.

Of course, in the end, it makes people feel safe. Far better that a government ran a neurological programme that brainwashed a man to massacre a cinema full of people for political gain, than to imagine the true horror of an individual spontaneous act of destruction.

there are highly intelligent ppl around the intelligence agencies that are linked to the us gov. the ppl in the gov are really just businessmen, talkers, paper pushers, and spokesmen, real power and decisions dont really sit with them. i would feel much safer if the odd madman was on the loose, as apose to elite mind control programmes (which are declassified and admitted) that can create carnage to further agendas.


this is interesting too.....

 

[Bold Seagull]

this is interesting too.....

Look in the mirror, smile, then pout. Look at your nose....

The only interesting thing is how the muscles in your face work for different expressions!

 

[Mellotron]

Look in the mirror, smile, then pout. Look at your nose....

The only interesting thing is how the muscles in your face work for different expressions!

This is complex stuff. You guys are in way too deep for me, sorry.

 

[BadFish]

So [MENTION=2850]brunswick[/MENTION]

How long will it take for the NWO, American Government, the UN or whoever to disarm the American people? On your chosen date we can bounce this thread and one of us will be right and one will be wrong. One can gloat and the other eat their words. either way we will know.

(can someone else bounce the thread and remind me because i have a terrible memory and will forget?........Maybe I have been brainwashed? My memory has been crap since had to pass on that message from Tony Blair to John Howard........something about a bush i think it was.)

 

[beorhthelm]

this is interesting too.....

whats interesting is ... nothing. same old conspriacies, always over reach, over complicate their narrative.

 

[The Spanish]

brunswick did the same after the norway massacre. i find it obscene.

 

[Acker79]

What the world has been waiting for; Michael Moore's response:

Its Not Really the Guns | MichaelMoore.com

 

[Beach Hut]

Saddest fact is that gun sales in Denver have now increased due to this

 

[brunswick]

So [MENTION=2850]brunswick[/MENTION]

How long will it take for the NWO, American Government, the UN or whoever to disarm the American people? On your chosen date we can bounce this thread and one of us will be right and one will be wrong. One can gloat and the other eat their words. either way we will know.

(can someone else bounce the thread and remind me because i have a terrible memory and will forget?........Maybe I have been brainwashed? My memory has been crap since had to pass on that message from Tony Blair to John Howard........something about a bush i think it was.)

ill go for before 25th december 2012 the new law will be passed, and will be being prepared to implement.......and we can bounce this too, and i will be happy to eat my words if wrong.

another decent link with information and symbolism regarding the denver shootings:

Was the "Batman Shooting" a Ritualistic Murder Carried Out by Mind Controlled Patsy? | The Vigilant Citizen

 

[BadFish]

ill go for before 25th december 2012 the new law will be passed, and will be being prepared to implement.......and we can bounce this too, and i will be happy to eat my words if wrong.

another decent link with information and symbolism regarding the denver shootings:

Was the "Batman Shooting" a Ritualistic Murder Carried Out by Mind Controlled Patsy? | The Vigilant Citizen

There are many questions asked in that article. The answer to most would appear to be "no".

My favourite is the 1966 comic depiction a shooting at a cinema. Given that batman comics have been around for, what? 70 years? They have run thousands of story lines and thousands of killings. I would imagine it would be more difficult to find a murder scenario or scene that they haven't used in a comic.

Merry Christmas.

 

[Guy Fawkes]

Or just dont make guns easily available to people! But this was obviously computer games fault!!!!!!

In incidences before computer games were as common or as violent, didn't cartoons and certain typers of music / singers / bands get some of the blame? Are these no longer playing a part or is it just too easy to pick a scapegoat (computer games in this case) and say its down (or partly down) to them?


On the issue of the US right to own and carry guns, I wonder how many of those at the cinema owned a gun and how many of those actually had it with them at that showing? (or how many people will now take their guns to any future films they watch at a cinema for that matter) Tragically this right certainly didn't make it a safer place for them to be which is one of the main arguments for them in the first place.

 

[dingodan]

What always makes me chuckle about [MENTION=2850]brunswick[/MENTION] conspiracy theories, is that they place great credit on the ability of the US government & it's agencies to carry out immensely complex and sophisticated operations, that deceive the world at large, and manipulate situations to their own end. The real implausibility of these claims is to imagine that these agencies and government have the competence, the coordination, and the intelligence to carry out even half of what they supposedly do. I suspect most of the US agencies would be to some degree flattered people consider that they are capable of undertaking such ambitious operations.

"The reality unknown to the public and to most members of Congress and the press is that secrets that would be of the greatest import to many of them can be kept from them reliably for decades by the executive branch, even though they are known to thousands of insiders." - Daniel Ellsberg - Pentagon Papers whistleblower

 

[Nibble]

Brunswick, brunswick, brunswick. dear oh dear oh dear. I knew you would bring up the dis-arming the nation hoopla. This could have been done a million times, by any number of governments, it hasn't. If it did, good. In fact if you read the original constitution it does not give all US citizens the right to bear arms. It gives any US citizen as part of a government approved, regulated militia the right to bear arms. If any US government had ever reallly wanted to dis-arm their public with a view to establishing a totalitarian government it could easily enforce the original spirit of the constitution. And if the givernment really wanted to install a totalitarian government why woudl armed civilians deter them? They have been arming half the world and then going to war with them for centuries. In short, you're a f***ing idiot.

 

[Mellotron]

another decent link with information and symbolism regarding the denver shootings:

Was the "Batman Shooting" a Ritualistic Murder Carried Out by Mind Controlled Patsy? | The Vigilant Citizen

It's not decent though, is it? What makes it "decent" for you? At the start it refers to laying out the facts, then proceeds to give pretty much ZERO factual evidence pointing towards this guy being mind controlled, just "bizarre" coincidences (that aren't bizarre at all, just the usual sorta stuff you can deduce from any case).

 

[brunswick]

Brunswick, brunswick, brunswick. dear oh dear oh dear. I knew you would bring up the dis-arming the nation hoopla. This could have been done a million times, by any number of governments, it hasn't. If it did, good. In fact if you read the original constitution it does not give all US citizens the right to bear arms. It gives any US citizen as part of a government approved, regulated militia the right to bear arms. If any US government had ever reallly wanted to dis-arm their public with a view to establishing a totalitarian government it could easily enforce the original spirit of the constitution. And if the givernment really wanted to install a totalitarian government why woudl armed civilians deter them? They have been arming half the world and then going to war with them for centuries. In short, you're a f***ing idiot.

so, after all your waffle, i think your trying to say that "why would the us gov outlaw guns now when they could have done it before?" i believe they are doing it now as when the economy crashes they will want their martial law to be the "ultimate authority" without any resistence.

your abuse has been reported.

 

[brunswick]

It's not decent though, is it? What makes it "decent" for you? At the start it refers to laying out the facts, then proceeds to give pretty much ZERO factual evidence pointing towards this guy being mind controlled, just "bizarre" coincidences (that aren't bizarre at all, just the usual sorta stuff you can deduce from any case).

a decent article for me, is one, that simply, makes me think. to you they are bizzare coincendences, to others they are symbolism, and to many people, there is no such thing as a coincendence.

 

[Mellotron]

so, after all your waffle, i think your trying to say that "why would the us gov outlaw guns now when they could have done it before?" i believe they are doing it now as when the economy crashes they will want their martial law to be the "ultimate authority" without any resistence.

your abuse has been reported.

Why didn't they do it to coincide with any previous big stock market crashes? Why did they choose this time?

 

[Mellotron]

a decent article for me, is one, that simply, makes me think. to you they are bizzare coincendences, to others they are symbolism, and to many people, there is no such thing as a coincendence.

To refuse that the concept of a coincidence exists is like saying that the sky is green and time actually goes backwards, not forwards.

That article puts forward a number of flimsy links that are more likely to be present in ANY shooting than not. At no point does it "make you think", really. Only on a very basic level.

OK, one example: The Joker poster where one eye is covered. What about the DOZENS of promotional materials where BOTH eyes are visible? The chances were that in one poster for a dark, shady film that some part of the actor may well be hidden, sihouetted, or similar.

 

[Nibble]

so, after all your waffle, i think your trying to say that "why would the us gov outlaw guns now when they could have done it before?" i believe they are doing it now as when the economy crashes they will want their martial law to be the "ultimate authority" without any resistence.

your abuse has been reported.

Again avoiding all logic. It's not waffle is it? It's just facts that you can't understand . Report me you massive, massive twat. At least if I'm banned I won't be tempted to reply to any of your f***ing inane horseshit. Christ.