Charity Shield 1910
New member
- Jan 4, 2021
- 556
He actually made a good point on football, how much are they spending on tests, agree or not - I’m not sure he has to hang his head in shame.
The amount of money being spent on testing in the Premier League, if that money was channelled back into the NHS and the vaccinations system, surely that’s a better place to be than it is just continuing testing a load of footballers two, three, four times a week. I appreciate there’ll be some people who say, ‘why should footballers get vaccinated?’, but ... if there’s 20 Premier League clubs and 100 vaccinations at a club, let’s say, I would imagine the payback to the system, the NHS and the vaccination system, financially, would be considerable.
“I’m told if you are vaccinated, you don’t need to keep testing. So therefore if the testing diminishes, that money could be used for a much better cause in my opinion, and therefore football stays a competitive industry rather than what it might end up, a skewed industry, because of players missing from games. I appreciate there will be people who disagree with me, probably wholeheartedly, but I just think the balance of getting some vaccinations quicker throughout football, the payback would be enormous.”
Have to agree to disagree. Where does he propose to push in for his 21 year old footballer? In front of the 90 year olds, 80 year olds, 70 year olds, terminally ill with 1 year to live and who would like to see some life before they die, or the factory worker who wants to pay the bills, or in front of other 21 year olds who might have no interest in football but would like to go travelling? Just wait your turn.