rudolf hucker
Active member
My first game was 1963. Always thought the later badges didn’t quite come up to it. So voted that way.
Like the current badge though.
Like the current badge though.
That's what I understood too - change it or we'll sue. Assume our current badge is fully copyrighted.It was a plain seagull, like the Hollister logo. We didn't get sued by them, fortunately. Below is an away kit from 2003-04.
.
Exactly the same here.74-75 for me, the Dolphin is great.
Of the Seagull badges the current iteration is my favourite
Wheres the one with the red background loved that badge
I get what you're saying. And I do love the heraldic style, but you gotta have your logo be simple enough that a kid can sketch on the back of their work book during a boring 3 period history class. The heraldic ones are just too complicated, cluttered and hard to recognize.Any heraldic badge for me. Most badges were of that type years ago, but very few left now. Fulham is a great example of how to go from a beautiful one to a complete mess.
View attachment 182835
Wouldn't Ritchie have gone for the rainbow badge?I’ve just realised our seagull changed direction on our current badge.
For some reason I’m outraged.
It has however, seemingly coincided with a change of direction and luck.
Naturally the 70s badge gets my vote.
I’m sure Ritchie Blackmore would vote the same way.
By God, he most certainly would.Wouldn't Ritchie have gone for the rainbow badge?
View attachment 182875
Same. It’s simple and clear.I like the current badge.
We've managed to create a simple, classic design without producing something that looked like an idea from a local council's focus group (see Fulham/Arsenal/West Ham).
Might have to turn it the other way again if we reappoint Potter!It was a conscious decision - to represent the club 'looking forwards, rather than back'.