That’s harsh, very harsh.Send the VAR bloke back to Australia !
That’s harsh, very harsh.Send the VAR bloke back to Australia !
Who could possibly look at the Mitoma penalty incident from several angles in slow motion and be so incompetent that they really believed it was not a penalty?Given the amount of so-called errors, yesterday, I can only think of two possible explanations:
The first is possible corruption (and the poll seems to suggest that many think that it's likely...although hard to prove), and the second is that it was the most incompetent officiating (even with the tools at their disposal) seen in any PL match....ever (so far!).
Assuming that the first option is not accepted, surely it has to be the second, in which case, will they be dismissed from their job? If not, why not?
Quite.Who could possibly look at the Mitoma penalty incident from several angles in slow motion and be so incompetent that they really believed it was not a penalty?
Imho it’s not corruption, a stitch up to give Villa and Spuds our place. That’s Italian football.Good conspiracy but I suspect we will find it is bollocks.
Do referees have secret meetings with the Big Six?
Who are the Big Six, anyway?
ManUre
Citeh
Liverpoo
Arse
Spuds
Chelusa
Whatabout* Newcastle, the richest club in the world?
How will the conspiracy elevate basket case Chelusa?
*And let's not forget Massive.
Cheers. Yes, unconscious bias (with a bit of cheeky conscious bias thrown in when it's 50:50). Jobza Baddun.Imho it’s not corruption, a stitch up to give Villa and Spuds our place. That’s Italian football.
Instead it’s the kind of bias you referred to in another thread shown towards Kane and Shearer. A reverence or fear, to be damn (and wrongly) sure to not make a faux pas that will hurt a big name club/players. To avoid that outcry, that unpopularity. No different from a ref bottling sending a Manure player off at OT.
It's very different. In the heat of the moment you can bottle a decision. But on VAR, you see the event replayed again and again and again, from different camera angles, in slow motion. The heat of the moment is taken out of the decision.Imho it’s not corruption, a stitch up to give Villa and Spuds our place. That’s Italian football.
Instead it’s the kind of bias you referred to in another thread shown towards Kane and Shearer. A reverence or fear, to be damn (and wrongly) sure to not make a faux pas that will hurt a big name club/players. To avoid that outcry, that unpopularity. No different from a ref bottling sending a Manure player off at OT.
I think you're right and I'm guessing that a fair proportion of people, when they use the word 'corruption' are really referring to bias. IMO, because I can't bring myself to believe there is match fixing.Imho it’s not corruption, a stitch up to give Villa and Spuds our place. That’s Italian football.
Instead it’s the kind of bias you referred to in another thread shown towards Kane and Shearer. A reverence or fear, to be damn (and wrongly) sure not make a faux pas that will hurt a big name club/players. To avoid that outcry, that unpopularity. No different from a ref bottling sending a Manure player off at OT.
...Good conspiracy but I suspect we will find it is bollocks.
Do referees have secret meetings with the Big Six?
Who are the Big Six, anyway?
Play the victim? Good idea.The club's response needs to be a bit pointed, something like 'BHA would like to thank PGMOL for yet another / the fourth apology received for refereeing errors in 2022/23. If its all very well with them, we'd rather not hear from them again this season'
They need something that isn't disrespectful, but that will give the media an angle to write stories around Brighton always suffering because of PGMOL's incompetence. That will give a bit of meat to the talk shows. Have Jim White doing a segment asking his panel of rentagobs whether they think that PGMOL have it in for the Seagulls?
We need all officials to be very aware that we've been on the wrong end of more than our fair share of their mistakes and plant a seed in their minds that they're under the spotlight and that any future decisions concerning us better be correct.
And it will soon be n=4. By the looks of it
In the commercial world 12 serious errors would have resulted in heads rolling. I think the on field officials are doing their best (albeit still crap at times) but the VAR guys are simply incompetent: they can’t see (or don’t want to see) what 99% of us can see. PGMOL - get some balls and sack them. Let’s see some action ffs not just a meaningless apology.From what I can collect together:
Aston Villa 2
West Ham 1
Newcastle United 1
Arsenal 2
Nottingham Forest 1
Manchester United 1
Brighton 3
Wolves 1