Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Teams representing more than one town...









AnotherArch

Northern Exile
Apr 2, 2009
1,199
Stockport & M62
Stoke City - represents 6 towns!
The CITY of Stoke-on-Trent is formed from six TOWNS of Fenton, Longton, Tunstall, Hanley, Stoke and Burslem.
Port Vale are in this conurbation.
 




Storer 68

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,827
Vauxhall Motors FC

Senrab FC is named after two streets rather than a proper place

I thought it was named after John Barnes (Senrab is Barnes backwards). at least, that's what bobby zamora told me, and he should know! He played for them
 




alan917

New member
Aug 5, 2005
86
How about Tranmere which i believe is in Birkenhead


Debatable apparently.

The name did exist on maps long ago and the club were formed after meeting in Port Vale House.

So a bit like Crystal Palace - except the name DID get used to name an area of South London.

Does "Everton" exist as a place anymore ? Don't think it does.

So (I think) Arsenal is the only team with a name that doesn't strictly relate to an historical place - since they've dropped the Greenwich bit.[/QUOTE]
 


Storer 68

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,827
Mr Chairman. On a point of geographical pendantry.

The City of Brighton and Hove is now a unitary authority and so we only represent ONE city. Whereas we used represent TWO boroughs.
 


Storer 68

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,827
How about Tranmere which i believe is in Birkenhead


Debatable apparently.

The name did exist on maps long ago and the club were formed after meeting in Port Vale House.

So a bit like Crystal Palace - except the name DID get used to name an area of South London.

Does "Everton" exist as a place anymore ? Don't think it does.

So (I think) Arsenal is the only team with a name that doesn't strictly relate to an historical place - since they've dropped the Greenwich bit.
[/QUOTE]

I think you'll find Woolwich Arsenal still exists. Indded you can buy a house there...........................................

if you've got a spare million quid.

David Danskin, from Kirkcaldy in Fife, worked at the Arsenal munitions factory in Woolwich. The Scot, a football man in an area dominated by rugby and cricket, founded a team with the help of three friends, Elijah Watkins, John Humble and Richard Pearce. The arrival in Woolwich of two Nottingham Forest players, Fred Beardsley and Morris Bates, had spurred Danskin into action.

Word got around and 15 men came forward, each prepared to pay sixpence to help start up a club. Danskin added another three shillings himself and the club bought a football. It was October 1886.

The club arranged its first game for December 1886 but had no name, no kit and nowhere to play. Danskin and company were referred to as Dial Square - after one of the factory's workshops - and crossed the Thames to play Eastern Wanderers on the Isle of Dogs.

Dial Square won 6-0 and met in the Royal Oak pub, next to Woolwich Arsenal station, on Christmas Day 1886. Beardsley solved the kit problem by asking his contacts at Nottingham Forest to help. They duly sent a complete set of red shirts.

And as they sat in the Royal Oak, the founding fathers chose a new name. They combined the name of the pub with their place of work - Royal Arsenal. It was far grander than 'Dial Square' and would be the club's name until 1891 when Woolwich Arsenal was formally adopted.
 
Last edited:




surrey jim

Not in Surrey
Aug 2, 2005
18,163
Bevendean








FlownWest

New member
Aug 10, 2010
294
Regarding Arsenal, Woolwich Arsenal as a place may well still exist but the club doesn't represent it anymore.

The tube station as people have said is named after the club - it's not the name of the locality. Don't see why this is even being debated, the club by its name do not represent a town or any other settlement.
 




Ecosse Exile

New member
May 20, 2009
3,549
Alicante, Spain
is "queens park" an actual place? as in the scottish team who play in front of about 500 people in a 50,000 seat stadium

Glad you asked this question, because i was going to answer yes it is, i know several people who describe where they live as Queens Park, indeed i used to live in Cathcart which is between Queens Park and Kings Park.
However i have just checked on google maps, several of the streets that i would describe as being in Queens Park just have Glasgow G41 or G42 as their postal address! So it would seem the answer is actually no, its just a park, near to Hampden!
 








Storer 68

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,827
Last edited:


Storer 68

New member
Apr 19, 2011
2,827
Regarding Arsenal, Woolwich Arsenal as a place may well still exist but the club doesn't represent it anymore.

The tube station as people have said is named after the club - it's not the name of the locality. Don't see why this is even being debated, the club by its name do not represent a town or any other settlement.

well technically we don't play in Brighton and Hove, we play in Lewes.........................................

"The parish of Falmer lies within the Kingston ward of Lewes District Council, which returns a single seat to the council"
 






Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here