Team for QPR

[BensGrandad]

I would go wih

Stockdale
Bruno....Hunemier.....Dunk.....Bong
Rosenior....Stephens...Kayal....Knockhaert
Baldok....Murray​

Subs; Maenpaa, Tomori, Hemed, March Sidwell/Norwood, Murph /Skalak.

If Dunk not fit replace him with Tomori and put Forren on the bench
If SB not fit replace with Murphy and Skalak on the bench.

I cannot see the point of Sidwell and Norwood on the bench and should be either or.

Sorry duly amended to not have 2 LR

 

[WATFORD zero]

I would go wih

Stockdale
Bruno....Hunemier.....Dunk.....Bong
Rosenior....Stephens...Kayal....Knockhaert
Baldok....Murray​

Subs; Maenpaa, Tomori, Rosenior, Hemed, March Sidwell/Norwood, Murphy/Skalak.

If Dunk not fit replace him with Tomori and put Forren on the bench
If SB not fit replace with Murphy and Skalak on the bench.

I cannot see the point of Sidwell and Norwood on the bench and should be either or.

Knocky in front of Bruno, Solly on the left and Baldock up front as I think it's a bit late to bring in someone new

Other than that - Perfect !

 

[spence]

I would go wih

Stockdale
Bruno....Hunemier.....Dunk.....Bong
Rosenior....Stephens...Kayal....Knockhaert
Baldok....Murray​

Subs; Maenpaa, Tomori, Rosenior, Hemed, March Sidwell/Norwood, Murphy/Skalak.

If Dunk not fit replace him with Tomori and put Forren on the bench
If SB not fit replace with Murphy and Skalak on the bench.

I cannot see the point of Sidwell and Norwood on the bench and should be either or.

plus 1

 

[WATFORD zero]

plus 1

I think we are only allowed 11

 

[Luke93]

I would go wih

Stockdale
Bruno....Hunemier.....Dunk.....Bong
Rosenior....Stephens...Kayal....Knockhaert
Baldok....Murray​

Subs; Maenpaa, Tomori, Rosenior, Hemed, March Sidwell/Norwood, Murphy/Skalak.

If Dunk not fit replace him with Tomori and put Forren on the bench
If SB not fit replace with Murphy and Skalak on the bench.

I cannot see the point of Sidwell and Norwood on the bench and should be either or.

We have two "Rosenior's" now? Blimey. At least that coveres left back.

 

[aolstudios]

Stockdale
Bruno Uwe Dunk Bong
Skalak Stephens Sidwell Knockers
Baldock Murray

Subs; Maenpaa, Tomori, Hemed, March, Akpom, Murphy, Rosenior

 

[BensGrandad]

We have two "Rosenior's" now? Blimey. At least that coveres left back.

Thank you as I hadnt noticed I had put him in twice but have duly amended it now.

 

[The Kid Frankie]

Providing all fit and ready I would go with the same starting line up as last night.

 

[Bob!]

I would go wih

Stockdale
Bruno....Hunemier.....Dunk.....Bong
Rosenior....Stephens...Kayal....Knockhaert
Baldok....Murray​

Subs; Maenpaa, Tomori, Hemed, March Sidwell/Norwood, Murph /Skalak.

If Dunk not fit replace him with Tomori and put Forren on the bench
If SB not fit replace with Murphy and Skalak on the bench.

I cannot see the point of Sidwell and Norwood on the bench and should be either or.

Sorry duly amended to not have 2 LR

Stockdale
Bruno Uwe Dunk Bong
Skalak Stephens Sidwell Knockers
Baldock Murray

Subs; Maenpaa, Tomori, Hemed, March, Akpom, Murphy, Rosenior

Why put Knocky on the left?

 

[Marshy]

Stockdale

Bruno
Dunk
Uwe
Bong ( providing he is fit enough to play twice in such a short period after his injury ) if not Rosenior

Kayal
Stephens
Knoackaert
March/Murphy does not really bother me this one, I really like Murphy on the left and away from home.

Baldock if fit, otherwise Hemed
Murray

 

[Petee]

Based on last 2 games, Bong and Bruno were both better than Poc and Rosenior.

I'd go for

Stockdale
Bruno Hunemeier Dunk Bong
Knockaert Stephens Kayal Murphy
Hemed Murray

Maenpaa
Tomori
Rosenior/Pocognoli
Sidwell
Norwood
March
Skalak

Edit - If Baldock fit, in for Hemed. Hemed replace Sidwell/Norwood on bench

 

[BensGrandad]

Providing all fit and ready I would go with the same starting line up as last night.

Hemed and Murray get in each others way so no I wouldnt iuf SB not fit either AK in no10 role with March our wide or Murphy as no 10.

 

[stss30]

I actually like the idea of playing Rosenior on the wing, but given that the Knockaert and Bruno combined on the right for 2 of our 3 goals last night don't think we should change it. Could play him on the left wing though as Solly has been pretty unconvincing recently and Skalak is very inconsistent.

 

[Marshy]

Hemed and Murray get in each others way so no I wouldnt iuf SB not fit either AK in no10 role with March our wide or Murphy as no 10.

Knockaert and Murphy as no10s has yet too work and won't work.

Baldock if fit will play behind Murray and rightly so, if not its Murray and Hemed and I dont have a problem with it as much as some, the goal record when they both play is decent.
Sure its not desireable but it performs way better than most think.

 

[Shropshire Seagull]

Providing all fit and ready I would go with the same starting line up as last night.

I doubt CH will do this, I think he has recognised some of his squad play better away, and vice-versa at home.
This is very useful as will help with rotation too.
Of course, there is a core of "always on the team sheet when fit" players too.

 

[The Kid Frankie]

I actually like the idea of playing Rosenior on the wing, but given that the Knockaert and Bruno combined on the right for 2 of our 3 goals last night don't think we should change it. Could play him on the left wing though as Solly has been pretty unconvincing recently and Skalak is very inconsistent.

We have 4 perfectly good wingers we don't need to play Rosenior on either wing.

 

[stss30]

We have 4 perfectly good wingers we don't need to play Rosenior on either wing.

We don't need to, but as I said I haven't been impressed with Solly or Skalak recently. Murphy or Rosenior I'd be equally happy with

 

[BensGrandad]

We have 4 perfectly good wingers we don't need to play Rosenior on either wing.

would give us greater defensive quality to hold them and score on the break

 

[Waynflete]

Thank you as I hadnt noticed I had put him in twice but have duly amended it now.

I thought we had Leroy in the squad for a minute


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Marshy]

would give us greater defensive quality to hold them and score on the break

We are not playing Man City away here or even a Newcastle away, why change something that has worked for 40 games bar the odd blip and has got us to the TOP of the league.

Its just way too negative in my opinion. Making this one change impacts the whole side, all of a sudden you are breaking up the Bruno Knockaert Combination, moving AK to a position he is not used too etc.. it has too many rippling effects.

Simplify as much as possible at this stage of the season, tried and trusted combinations.