As an accountant I would have thought you would have understood £1,500 was a lot of money in 1966. They, and us as a family, have had some holidays - most very modest ones in Devon or Cornwall. My wider point is that people shouldn't be taxed on an asset they have made sacrifices to get and have no control over how it's value increases ( or possibly decreases ) if the tax has been paid on the money to buy said asset - especially one that can't really be valued without selling it. Tax at the point of income or sale and no more.
Equally to tax people on the value of their property ( excluding council tax or rates - poll tax was a far fairer way of paying for services ) is an unfair system - you might as well tax people on their shoe size.
My word.
OK lets's do this REALLY simply.
I have stated on numerous occasions that I DISAGREE with the idea of taxing everyone (council tax aside) on the value of the house they live in.
My point was that you are making a monumental TIT of yourself on this thread by using your "look at me I'm inheriting a fortune and I'll make sure I pay no tax on it" stance.
Not exactly what 99% of the population want to hear at the moment. Oh and your totally erroneous rubbish that capital gains are somehow "earned income". If they were then they would be taxed accordingly. Has the penny dropped?
You don't have a wider point, you don't answer anything I write. Carry on if you like, but I'll carry on ripping it to shreds. I've not even started on this post of yours alone, because I'm being nice.
LLx