Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Tammy Abraham



perseus

Broad Blue & White stripe
Jul 5, 2003
23,460
Sūþseaxna
Oh well. We just need someone better, probably taking another non-U21 place in the squad - bad news for 1 of Murphy, Norwood or Skalak I guess, who may need to give up their place in the 25.

It's only the Daily Mail and it counts Newcastle out for signing other players on loan from Chelsea. Plenty of others.
 




Dorset Seagull

Once Dolphin, Now Seagull
Last season Chelsea had 67 players out on loan. What a joke

However this works pretty well for Juventus and brings in millions. You loan them out for a fee and their wages so you are in profit. You then either sell them at a later date for a fantastic transfer fee or if they turn out to be the real deal you have a superstar on the books. The more decent youngsters you have the more money you make
 


S'hampton Seagull

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2003
6,946
Southampton
Hmmm, Daily mail are fairly reliable with these stories so we move on. Not a great start for the annual striker search

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 


um bongo molongo

Well-known member
Jul 26, 2004
3,052
Battersea
Hugely disappointing if true. Think he's perfect for how we play - physical presence, pace, an eye for goal and seems like a decent sort. Shows how difficult signing what we need is going to be, even with the PL millions
 










DarrenFreemansPerm

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Sep 28, 2010
17,445
Shoreham
Payments from the PL to clubs is broken down as follows -

An equity payment - an overseas TV payment - a central commercial payment.

Each club receives an equal share of these payments.

On top of that there is a

Facilities payment - based on the number of times a club appears on domestic TV (and each club has a minimum amount.

A merit payment - prize money

This season Sunderland received £100million from the above payments.

However - excluding the top six clubs - on average clubs receive approx 60% - 65% of their income from TV, prize money and commercial payments from the PL. the other 35% - 40% comes from match day receipts and the club's direct commercial activity. Man Utd receive approx 50% of its income from its own commercial activities.

The minimum income for a club in the PL is approx £160million - £170million and it goes up from there - Man Utd will have an income of well over £500million this year - it would have been close to £600million if they played in the Champions League.

N.B. Parachute payments for teams relegated this year are based on the income they recevied from the PL - 55% in year 1, 45% in year 2 and then 3 years at 20% of that.

If we get relegated after one season we only receive two years of parachute payments, not three.
 






whitelion

New member
Dec 16, 2003
12,828
Southwick
N.B. Parachute payments for teams relegated this year are based on the income they recevied from the PL - 55% in year 1, 45% in year 2 and then 3 years at 20% of that.

So is that a total of five years parachute payments?

If we get relegated after one season we only receive two years of parachute payments, not three.

So is that 55% and 45% as in [MENTION=33329]Jolly Red Giant[/MENTION] above?
 


Thunder Bolt

Silly old bat




Bra

Well-known member
Feb 21, 2009
1,366
patcham
Shame if true, we certainly need more pace and movement up top. Personally believe we need 2 forwards and they will cost. On to plan b I guess.
 


stss30

Registered User
Apr 24, 2008
9,546
Shame if true, we certainly need more pace and movement up top. Personally believe we need 2 forwards and they will cost. On to plan b I guess.

We will probably only play one up front next season. A pacy striker would be a nice option to have but personally think we could do with a top quality hold up player at the top of the transfer target list.
 








Blackadder

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 6, 2003
16,121
Haywards Heath
Trouble is, we are now in to June, which means the usual suspects will start the usual annual "Doom and Gloom" Threads (and many of them!).
 




Gritt23

New member
Jul 7, 2003
14,902
Meopham, Kent.
Shame if true, and I don't think it would be the best move for the player either as he will compete with Gayle for his place, Come here and he was a shoe-in for many more starts, which is what he and his parent club want for him.
 




S'hampton Seagull

Well-known member
Oct 12, 2003
6,946
Southampton
Trouble is, we are now in to June, which means the usual suspects will start the usual annual "Doom and Gloom" Threads (and many of them!).

Very true. The mood was not good after we missed out on Pritchard and we did ok after that!
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here