Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Substitutions!
- Thread starter GJN1
- Start date
AmexRuislip
Retired Spy 🕵️♂️
It's what he's paid to do, before that we could've scored, but obviously didn't.
BadFish
Huge Member
- Oct 19, 2003
- 18,201
Because getting spanked is demoralising. Slow and steady wins the race (well comes 17th in this case).
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Bladders
Twats everywhere
He knows goal difference could be vital . Let the others get spanked 4 & 5 nil
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Maybe you should ask him.....for me he’s got a heck of a lot of credit in the bank and if you think the subs were the only reason why we looked better in the last ten minutes ..i’d say a lot was to do with Arsenal switching off
Two Professors
Two Mad Professors
Far too late-65 minutes.
Cheeky Monkey
Well-known member
- Jul 17, 2003
- 23,870
Yep, 15 minutes or less substitutions are for time wasting when you're winning, not for affecting the game in any meaningful way when you're 2-0 down.
Especially when we have lost out on promotion with it before.
I thought he got it about right today.
Our shape was good throughout and we were always were going to leave it late before changing anything.
Murray is obviously carrying a knock hence only 15 mins. Izquierdo was doing fine defensively, and saw very little ball in the second half. March was spent so Schelotto was sensible........
Sorry don't agree.
The only thing I might have done differently at 0-2 was keep Izquierdo on and bring on Molumby for Gross, just for the experience (and switched Propper further forward).
The red pepper kid
Well-known member
- Dec 30, 2014
- 693
nah don't think so
Raleigh Chopper
New member
Difficult game to judge what would or could have happened, we should have scored at least 1 maybe 2, but Arsenal who were still in 2nd gear would have probably stepped up as they often do late in the game.
I think Chris more or less got it right, 2-0 is better than 4 or 5, I have just accepted this one and moved on.
But I must say that apart from the 2 goals I thought that considering the quality of their players, that their shooting was awful and Ryan had a good game.
I think Chris more or less got it right, 2-0 is better than 4 or 5, I have just accepted this one and moved on.
But I must say that apart from the 2 goals I thought that considering the quality of their players, that their shooting was awful and Ryan had a good game.
BensGrandad
New member
I would have tried him when they scored their 2nd goal as we dont have another game for 2 weeks and Baldock is scheduled to play for U 23s next week.
LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Have you applied?
Worried Man Blues
Well-known member
CH has been studying Giraffe's tracker and realised we didn't have to win this one
I don't disagree but we looked a lot more competitive once Knockaert and Muzzah were on the field.
Justice
Dangerous Idiot
Soon as the second went in was the time to make changes Murray was a handful in the box and Knockhaert was causing problems shame