BensGrandad
New member
Simple question that I am trying to rack my brain about when have we brought on a sub that has changed the course of a game in our favour?
Simple question that I am trying to rack my brain about when have we brought on a sub that has changed the course of a game in our favour?
Simple question that I am trying to rack my brain about when have we brought on a sub that has changed the course of a game in our favour?
Simple question that I am trying to rack my brain about when have we brought on a sub that has changed the course of a game in our favour?
Most subs have been like for like to freshen up players rather than a different option to freshen up the tactic
Eric Potts in 1978.Simple question that I am trying to rack my brain about when have we brought on a sub that has changed the course of a game in our favour?
Eric Potts in 1978.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
That is my view and would sometimes rather they be brought on to change the game like yesterday when looking unlikely to score. If only we had a David Fairclough a la Liverpool of the 70s and 80s.
We only have like for like in every position. Goes back to the summer were we failed to get the different striker we needed.
I know it has been mentioned many times but I would have liked to have bought on SB yesterday as he offers something different to both Murray and Hemed.
I know it has been mentioned many times but I would have liked to have bought on SB yesterday as he offers something different to both Murray and Hemed.and may have been the one to break the deadlock with his mobility.
We only have like for like in every position. Goes back to the summer were we failed to get the different striker we needed.
Maybe Hughton would have sent him on if he'd been on the bench; he wasn't, so the option wasn't available.I know it has been mentioned many times but I would have liked to have bought on SB yesterday as he offers something different to both Murray and Hemed.and may have been the one to break the deadlock with his mobility.
More chance of you being brought on![]()
Something going on with Baldock that is being kept from us.
Maybe Hughton would have sent him on if he'd been on the bench; he wasn't, so the option wasn't available.
Simple question that I am trying to rack my brain about when have we brought on a sub that has changed the course of a game in our favour?
Our subs tend to be brought on to ensure that we maintain what we have already got from the game. Unless you are an established PL team who can bring a £40m+ player off the bench it is unlikely that any sub will impact a PL game to the extent that you are possibly looking for.
Its a puzzle for sure...i think most would prefer to see Baldock as cover for Gross and not Izzy Brown