Zukey Seagull
Well-known member
He shot
he scored
Could it be Stephen ward !
he scored
Could it be Stephen ward !
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Stephen Ward
- Thread starter stss30
- Start date
Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
It MUST be Stephen Ward!
How good it was, to sing that old song tonight, the family stand was rocking!
Zen Frenzy
New member
I wasn't convinced when he started but he's improved brilliantly as the season has progressed. Ultra reliable at the moment and should've been MOM tonight.
Shoreham Beach Seagull
Active member
Well that was proved tonight. skinned about 6 times, made 4 brilliant challenge and then THAT cross. He is so frustrating to watch.
Zukey Seagull
Well-known member
Be good to get it going again. He deserves a song. He has been excellent for a long time.
Agreed.
pottert
New member
No complaints about MOM tonight.
Although I thought back 4 were all good tonight.
When I say back 4 I mean Upson,dunk,ward & tomaz.
I don't know what to say about Bruno.He puts the team in trouble 1 minute by trying to be to clever but a minute later he is involved in a fantastic move that scores us a goal.
Although I thought back 4 were all good tonight.
When I say back 4 I mean Upson,dunk,ward & tomaz.
I don't know what to say about Bruno.He puts the team in trouble 1 minute by trying to be to clever but a minute later he is involved in a fantastic move that scores us a goal.
Cheeky Monkey
Well-known member
- Jul 17, 2003
- 23,884
From the tone of his Argus piece today I got the same feeling I had when BZ was asked if he'd be at Brighton next season (he wasn't) and replied "That would be nice." For me I think he'd like to return to Wolves. May be wrong.
Pavilionaire
Well-known member
- Jul 7, 2003
- 31,278
He looked thrilled to get on the score sheet. Great for him, great for the team.
AZ Gull
@SeagullsAcademy @seagullsacademy.bsky.social
Absolutely - and it's about bloody time someone actually acknowledges that he didn't just materialize at the training ground one day, but that he was "recruited". I doubt there are more than a small handful of posters on this board who would have wanted Ward over Bridge last pre-season; and many wanted Shorey to be offered a deal; however, the football operations department have played a blinder with this one.
saafend_seagull
Well-known member
He probably doesn't care, just somewhere to match his 30k a week salary he wants and know he would only get 15-18k max here.
spring hall convert
Well-known member
I'm very fond of him and think he's been very good this season as part of a fantastic defensive unit.
I'm a little worried with wages and fee he might be a little out of our reach. We'll see, I'd gladly have him here on a full time basis.
I'm a little worried with wages and fee he might be a little out of our reach. We'll see, I'd gladly have him here on a full time basis.
spring hall convert
Well-known member
I would hope he'd get nowhere near that, it's way above what we should be paying for a left back. 10k, absolute maximum I'd say and that's why he won't be here next year.
saafend_seagull
Well-known member
Why not? We paid 20k for a left back season before.
spring hall convert
Well-known member
And we lost over £13m pound that season. Also, as good as Ward is he is nowhere near Bridge's quality.
Langley
New member
Not if he is going to sit on the bench,
nwgull
Well-known member
Decent player, but not worth making him one of our highest earners, and I can't see him taking a drop in wages with 1 year still to go on his contract.
I think Chicksen is the long term plan; what would've been the point of buying him (and him turning down a contract renewal at MK) otherwise?
I think Chicksen is the long term plan; what would've been the point of buying him (and him turning down a contract renewal at MK) otherwise?
