Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

stadium delayed







One thing I know is that the members of the Stadium Project Team who visit NSC don't come here to make announcements about what's happening. They are, however, known to be great fans of Mr Easy 10, who has displaced their earlier favourite - Ernest.

Personally, I think they have work to be getting on with.
 


















algie

The moaning of life
Jan 8, 2006
14,713
In rehab




Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405






BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
''I'm in no way an expert on these things, but I read that this economic downturn might last a year to 18 months or so. This is a financial package that will be in place for 10/15/20/25/30 years.* Seeing as no-one knows how things will be in 5 or 10 years' time, surely the economic situation now ought not impact too heavily on the lifetime of the package? Perhaps someone can comment...?''

The problem with that is, that even if the financiers agree with your assertion of an 18 month downturn, then they may decide to 'sit tight' until there is evidence of any upturn.

Why would they consider to take the risk today ?

Banks remain historically generous in times of growth and likewise quite unyielding at other times.

I am sure there will be re-negotiations in the coming weeks and months, with the banks maybe trying to minimise their own risks whilst arguing for greater funding from other areas, either commercial or personal avenues.
 


The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
''I'm in no way an expert on these things, but I read that this economic downturn might last a year to 18 months or so. This is a financial package that will be in place for 10/15/20/25/30 years.* Seeing as no-one knows how things will be in 5 or 10 years' time, surely the economic situation now ought not impact too heavily on the lifetime of the package? Perhaps someone can comment...?''

The problem with that is, that even if the financiers agree with your assertion of an 18 month downturn, then they may decide to 'sit tight' until there is evidence of any upturn.

Why would they consider to take the risk today ?

Banks remain historically generous in times of growth and likewise quite unyielding at other times.

I am sure there will be re-negotiations in the coming weeks and months, with the banks maybe trying to minimise their own risks whilst arguing for greater funding from other areas, either commercial or personal avenues.

True, but it's not as though the 'banks' are footing the entire bill for this project.
 






The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
I havent a clue what the lending ration might be, what is it ??

Don't know.

At the Public Inquiry, the club stated (though I stand to be corrected) it needed to borrow £29m out of a then projected cost of £44m.

We will have to see what the final bill will come out at, and to what the club can and can't claim for in comparison to 2003 when that statement was made. Plus I don't know how much the Brighton & Hove City College part of the development will put into the coffers.
 


BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
Don't know.

At the Public Inquiry, the club stated (though I stand to be corrected) it needed to borrow £29m out of a then projected cost of £44m.

We will have to see what the final bill will come out at, and to what the club can and can't claim for in comparison to 2003 when that statement was made. Plus I don't know how much the Brighton & Hove City College part of the development will put into the coffers.

Still quite significant, so IF the banks have become as risk aversed as some think, then I wouldnt be surprised if there might be some tough negotiations ahead.
 


steward 433

Back and better
Nov 4, 2007
9,512
Brighton
Still quite significant, so IF the banks have become as risk aversed as some think, then I wouldnt be surprised if there might be some tough negotiations ahead.

I really don't think Price Waterhouse Coopers would have taken it on if they had too many doubts as would they really risk ruining their reputation??
 




BigGully

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2006
7,139
I really don't think Price Waterhouse Coopers would have taken it on if they had too many doubts as would they really risk ruining their reputation??

The reason such a credible company has taken it on is because it IS frigging hard to raise that amount of money at any time let alone now.

Otherwise DK would of popped into the Halifax Huilding Society ATM and withdrawn £20 million in £20 notes and had the diggers in by now !!
 


Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,761
at home
I really don't think Price Waterhouse Coopers would have taken it on if they had too many doubts as would they really risk ruining their reputation??

au contraire

My father worked as a consultant for Coopers in London and there was a certain kudos in taking on jobs that they could bring in on budget when all hope was lost. Not that all hope is lost with Falmer, but I think there is a lot of nievity about if people think that this downturn will not affect us!!
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here