Barrel of Fun
Abort, retry, fail
Probably something like ProVal, TLO.
I said this on another thread a few weeks ago, so it might well have been buried. Not that I understand the full blown workings, but here goes...
I was having a conversation with Derek Chapman back in April, who, as you know is very involved in the project.
He was talking about the finances - not the details, just the machinations. He was saying about the fluidity of the financing package and how they can factor in so many variables into the programme (something I'm assuming was a glorified Excel spreadsheet, though probably far more sophisticated than that), including how repayments can be met in the event of a rise or fall in the numbers through the door, a rise or fall in merchandising, sponsorship, advertising, salaries - everything that goes into the running of the club.
"Oh, we've got this programme, you can type any facking numbers in that affect the stadium, and it will give you a whole load of new reports and forecasts. It's brilliant..."
The point I'm making is that the club appears to be very aware of all financial conditions affecting various aspects of trade and industry, and how they might affect the club, and is cutting its cloth accordingly.
That was the feeling I got from him, anyway.
Till somone quotes him then im afraid its back to sq 1On a slightly different note, I've just added Steward 433 to my ignore list as I got fed up with reading page upon page of endless posts of utter SHITE. This thread is actually readable now.
All of a sudden the board is a better place again.
On a slightly different note, I've just added Steward 433 to my ignore list as I got fed up with reading page upon page of endless posts of utter SHITE. This thread is actually readable now.
All of a sudden the board is a better place again.
utter SHITE?
i thought he was the only one on here who spoke the truth and knew EVERYTHING
He does, fact:thud:utter SHITE?
i thought he was the only one on here who spoke the truth and knew EVERYTHING
Till somone quotes him then im afraid its back to sq 1
On a slightly different note, I've just added Steward 433 to my ignore list as I got fed up with reading page upon page of endless posts of utter SHITE. This thread is actually readable now.
All of a sudden the board is a better place again.
That is a masive insult to LIIt is like having a watered down version of London Irish.
utter SHITE?
i thought he was the only one on here who spoke the truth and knew EVERYTHING
That is a masive insult to LI
indeed
But how do any of you lot actually have a clue what i know?
But how do any of you lot actually have a clue what i know?
Till somone quotes him then im afraid its back to sq 1
But how do any of you lot actually have a clue what i know?
Ed I do not know the ins and outs of commercial finance so I am sure you are right
Yes I hear that TLO - my concerns are two fold. One is that `he would say that wouldn't he`. No-one involved in the project would dare share any deep rooted concerns with anyone but the innermost circle because the project is partly confidence based, especially at the moment. Secondly - even since April, conditions have worsened so much that what was achievable then may not be now. Truly I hope not, but I think we all need to be aware of the dangers.
Spose. But at least over half of its gone now. After all theres only so many ways to post that you know more than everyone else on any subject thats discussed.
But how do any of you lot actually have a clue what i know?