crookie
Well-known member
Disgrace. Safety ?? Joke
Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Southern Rail STRIKE details
- Thread starter Ernest
- Start date
The Large One
Who's Next?
They've been on strike for 17 days since April, but you hate them for nigh on a year? So what did they do before that to ruin your family's life? And for the other 500+ non-strike days?
Tony Meolas Loan Spell
Slut Faced Whores
Yeah I dont think the Government stop paying Southern. Maybe they should. Thing is we dont know. Its all shrouded in mystery hence the crowdfunding to get some answers.
You're clearly not a commuter otherwise you would not need to ask the question....
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
Just a wild guess here, but the conveniently high level of staff sickness that has coincidentally been going on since this dispute first started running might be a reason?
27 days by the end of December. That's more days than I get annual leave in a YEAR.
If I don't sneak off early / in late than strike days would mean getting home an hour later than normal couples with a 25 mile round trip drive, £17 parking per day.
Scotty Mac
New member
- Jul 13, 2003
- 24,405
Of course it has petal xx
Insel affe
HellBilly
It is not just the strike days, its the late and cancelled trains everything top to bottom unions, government and Southern the whole thing is a disgrace.
You say that, but David Boyle, so triumphed by those on your side, did say in one of his blog posts:
"As I understand it, the sickness levels among frontline staff have now sunk back to pre-dispute levels"
Are you suggesting that sickness levels were BELOW normal levels, as it's certainly my take is that he was saying that sickness had gone up. Or, in other words, "high level of sickness".
deletebeepbeepbeep
Well-known member
- May 12, 2009
- 21,794
The late and cancelled trains have nothing to do with the unions unless they are on a strike day, they are due to the incompetence of Southern and lack of investment into our rail infrastructure.
Well, that and sniffles, yes.
Insel affe
HellBilly
Which is what I have put in my post " top to bottom unions, government and Southern the whole thing is a disgrace"
It is the whole treatment of the paying public that I am concerned about, all very well defending the unions if you wish but they ARE contributing to the misery of thousands of people that you can not deny.
Insel affe
HellBilly
Proved by who an internal report perhaps ?
You and I know no one can prove anything of the sort it is impossible to prove if someone could have gone to work or is just pulling a flanker.
To purely blame the unions for this omni-f***ing-shambles is stupid.
To say the unions aren't in some way to blame is equally as stupid.
To say the unions aren't in some way to blame is equally as stupid.
Tony Meolas Loan Spell
Slut Faced Whores
Summed up PERFECTLY
Buzzer
Languidly Clinical
- Oct 1, 2006
- 26,121
Hang on. That's not true. Southern even published the sickness rates in May, I think it was, and there were on average 3 days sick for every person. It was debated in this very thread.
Insel affe
HellBilly
Why call everyone stupid ?
You clearly have a personal agenda on this subject, and a holier-than-thou attitude on the subject.
Just because you maybe in the union and have an opinion that does not make you right just as it does not make me right by thinking your wrong Nor does it make you stupid.
What I do know is that the unions and everyone else are using the paying public for their own ends, that you can not deny. Picking days to strike in the at key times for maximum effect and trying to force Southerns hand, all of which affects the commuters who are being treated like mugs....
pearl
Well-known member
aslef didn't fight DOO on other routes did they, now the RMT have encouraged the guards to accept new contracts they are stuffed pretty much, just my opinion btw!