glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
I couldn't work out what you were saying either
If you don't use the "ANCESTRY" website then you probably won't
I couldn't work out what you were saying either
Do you know why grinds my years about yanks?
If there is one hint of Irish ancestory, they're immediately Irish...
Well DNA would prove a lot are.
They've only been around a few hundred years. Why make history when you can pinch it from someone else?
Is it just me who find their desperate desire to be Irish amusing? Not exactly a badge of honour.
Your postie is dragging his heels, ty.It's just you. In my travels around the globe the Irish seemed to be universally well liked by all.
Your postie is dragging his heels, ty.
You need to get out more....or at least read a little before spouting complete and utter ill informed nonsense.
So...ghenghis khan, pharaoh xerxes and Hirohito were all Europeans?
On that basis, most Irish Americans are there only because the English drove them out of Ireland during the famine. Victims, not perpetrators of slavery, shirley?The entire American continent is inhabited by People with European ancestry and until the last 70 years a good size of the
African American population was there only because the Europeans bought them in as slaves.
I don't think those 3 people worked alone...three people compared to how many Europeans?
The Mongols invaded Europe, as well as anywhere else they could get to. The Egyptians had their fun earlier, when global travel was less easy. It's not like any invading force stops for chivalric reasons. And to suggest Europeans are more invasive as a race is just ill-educated and racist.The Europeans Caucasians are historically and inherently more invasive as a race than any other.
Where are the Mongols, the Egyptians and Japanese found elsewhere in the world as a result of their invasiveness?
Don't forget that your ancestors were almost certainly slaves to the Romans.On that basis, most Irish Americans are there only because the English drove them out of Ireland during the famine. Victims, not perpetrators of slavery, shirley?
Personally, I find these arguments a bit confusing. As a "European", am I responsible for slavery? As a descendant of Irish immigrants into Scotland in the 1840s, am I a victim of English neglect of Ireland? As a descendant of Yorkshire Catholics (way back to the sixteenth century), am I a victim of protestant persecution? (Or is that something I can claim from the Irish ancestry?) As a descendant of ironworkers from the Black Country, should I be a Wolverhampton Wanderers supporter?
..three people compared to how many Europeans? I know there are others but that's just playing devils advocate.
.
The Europeans Caucasians are historically and inherently more invasive as a race than any other.
Was blowing a gale yesterday. Hopefully it's not been blown half the way back!
Always winning a works series when they are the only nation taking part the Americans are good at that
Here we go again with this 'Racist' anti American claptrap...when are people going to realise that there are good and bad people of all races...race has nothing to do with it.A lot of people on here are probably related to Americans through the past...too belittle them because they have 'no history'...is that their fault. Americans are a collection of all different races...as are we. Some will scream 'Racist' at anyone who utters a remark against anyone because of their African descent...yet the same people come out with anti Americanisms...is that not racism ? Does'nt matter which way you cut it...if it was not for America and their industries we would've be under the jackboot...Their contribution to the World War was immense...study history with an open mind.