Posting ages would be a paedo paradise shirley.
Posting ages would be a paedo paradise shirley.
I don't think that's particularly fair, although Bars Mar's MONTH LONG ban is a disgrace when you look at his posts compared to some of the others that hkfc highlighted yesterday.You dont need heavy handed moderation but what you do need is sensible, fair and consistant moderation, I get the feeling sometimes that moderating decisions are based less on what is posted and more on who has posted it.
I GENUINELY don't think there is much wrong with the way the board is set up and I think too much tinkering with the forums would take away much of what is great about NSC.
There has always been a near obsession with post counts and I'm glad that that has now all gone. I'm sure there are a few people who (deliberately or otherwise) post a load of bollocks JUST to get their post counts up and as well as that, there is a certain amount of superiority from some of the people who are on here more often than others and can SWOOP on the slightest indiscretion with the pathetically infantile use of the word 'fixtures'.
I also think some people love to poke their nose into threads and love to start arguments just for the sake of it, rather than any real reason. If you were in a PROPER pub you'd just walk away, muttering about 'that TWAT who keeps talking bollocks'. It's not all that difficult to just not open a thread you know is full of shit.
Speaking as a fairly new MOD, I think the whole process works pretty well but I guess slightly more structured guidelines to cover infractions would help everyone. I wouldn't want to go too far down that road though - over-policing is just as SHIT as no policing at all.
Much of the GOONERY that is around at the moment is due to the lack of proper match action. I'm sure things will calm down once 9th August comes around.
Some of us are lovers, some of us are fighters.
I think NSC is fine as it is. If there is some football gossip taking place about the Albion it ALWAYS takes precedence through weight of posters. Alternatively, if there is a fallow period (as at present), then the debate widens as the boredom grows.
As for the infractions, I think it is too time consuming and ultimately will lead to more arguments as there will be endless debates on what constitutes a particular number of points. Should, for example, Algie's signature and avatar constitute a racist infraction, and if not why not (four pages of debate follows).
NSC is THE Brighton messageboard because of its liberal attitude and belief that MOST (not all) posters know the difference between right and wrong. Heavy handed moderation on other sites has led to a reluctance to post and tumbleweed level of daily interaction.
One of NSC's strengths is the sheer variety of topics, which tend to reflect our thoughts on a daily basis, sometimes these are football focused, on other occasions they are dominated by other sports, social, music, economic or other events.........just as in real life.
In my OPINION (not fact), NSC ain't broke, so don't try to mend it
i'll also be controversial and say i don't think there's anything wrong with the board. You just get the odd wally, myself included, that likes to be deliberatley provocative and have a laugh. You also get the odd genuine twat which makes it even better. And no matter what you do you'll never get away from tossers. Don't change anything.
I can still see my post count
I have thought about that actually - £1000 behind the bar type thing but just don't know how we could prevent 'abuse' - people bringing their mates for a 'free' drink or a glut of new members just to qualify or something. Open to suggestions if people can think of a way of making it work.
I have thought about that actually - £1000 behind the bar type thing but just don't know how we could prevent 'abuse' - people bringing their mates for a 'free' drink or a glut of new members just to qualify or something. Open to suggestions if people can think of a way of making it work.
An alternative to having different forums would be to have a post tag which people are forced to select when posting. These could include football, cricket, sport, o/t, nsfw, etc to give an indication of what to expect in the post. It would also allow people to apply a filter to include/exclue cerain ones if they wished.
I would also suggest that people shouldn't just c&p news stories (from the BBC, Argus, etc), especially when they don't then follow them up with their own thoughts/opinions.
I think this is a pretty good idea to be honest. Personally I think the board is absolutely fine as it is but I know that what problmes people do have is not wanting the football threads mixed up with all the O/T ones. If, as Bad Ash says, you have to click an icon out of the ones below to say what the thread is about, and then each user could adjust the filter to show what they want to see it could suit all parties.
Eg
Albion related
Football related
Cricket related
Betting related
General off topic
and people can filter to show 1, 2, 3, or all topics. We do have the Icons already for general football, cricket and horse racing, we'd just need to add any relevant onces and make it compulsory to click at least one icon.
Do-able Bozza?
Threads older than say 3 months are automatically locked, and if they wish to be re-opened by a poster, then they have to PM a moderator and give a reason why it should be bought back.
Gets rid of the shitty bounces.
Alternitavely, make your own? Hi, I'm new.I feel naked without the post counter
Bring it back!
.