GoingUp
Well-known member
PeterOut;10032704[B said:]I disagree, I'm afraid. Just this week, with very heavy rain, my satellite dish was unable to pick up the signal, so the picture dropped out / went blocky / stalled etc, several times.[/B]
I have had Virgin in the past, and they are just as dependent on the cables not getting broken as Sky are planning to be.
And even the old-fashoined TV mast broadcasting analogue signals is not immune from failure - just ask the million+ viewers in Noth Yorkshire, many of whom are still without a picture months later.
Any of the systems above can and do work very well - until something goes wrong. With the current main options available, the satellite dish approach seems to me to be a more robust one than the BT landline approach that I believe Sky are trying to switch some viewers to. But, in time, I imagine a variation on cable TV will become the norm, at least until the next technological breakthrough. maybe 6G or 7G will have the bandwidth to deliver UHD+ to every TV set?
Yeah mine has done this on occasion but tbh its rare and overall is miles better than streaming (for sports).