He also said that someone had upset the orange cart and thrown a monkey into the works.Chris Cattlin made a great point about the amount of live football on TV, "I love fish and chips, but I couldn't eat them every day."
He also said that someone had upset the orange cart and thrown a monkey into the works.Chris Cattlin made a great point about the amount of live football on TV, "I love fish and chips, but I couldn't eat them every day."
I certainly wouldI wouldn't think it would affect that at all. Would people start subscribing just because they can now watch on Saturday afternoon?
yeah the preloaded ones are what I meant. Freely available.No because watching porn on my laptop isn't illegal (as far as I know). Watching copyrighted content on whatever device (the most popular it would seem is a firestick preloaded with IPTV software and subscription) is. Therefore dodgy.
I get your point but you are be slightly pedantic.
The second paragraph contradicts the first IMO. You say "as much as I'd love to be able..." and then point out that anyone with a firestick is, in fact, able.As much as I'd love to be able to watch 3pm KO's live, it would only cement the already well known fact that football revolves around TV money, rather than the fans.
If the 3pm blackout was lifted, it'll all centre around TV companies adding even more time slots, with limited games scheduled for 3pm on a Saturday. They won't want multiple matches with the same KO. Already we've got Friday nights, Saturday midday, Saturday evenings, and now rumours of Sunday evenings. Be careful what you wish for.
As for FireSticks, there are 2 main reasons people use them:
1) To watch matches that are not scheduled to be on TV - problem solved by lifting the blackout.
2) To circumnavigate the exorbitant cost of having to have contracts with Sky, TNT and Amazon Prime to have access to televised matches - problem further enflamed by adding more TV offerings and likely bringing more providers to the market.
You're a visionary my old fruit!Been saying this for years. Or even giving sports clubs free/heavily subsidised Sky Sports/BT.
Sky could broadcast several games at 5pm, but they know you can only watch one game at a time. the broadcasters are selling all you can eat football weekender. 3pm just opens one more slot.The second paragraph contradicts the first IMO. You say "as much as I'd love to be able..." and then point out that anyone with a firestick is, in fact, able.
I actually voted to remove it BECAUSE of the risk of 6.30 Sunday games if we don't. This slot is only being added to accomodate the additional televised games that cannot be shown at 3pm Sat. If you allowed two or three of them on it would be easily done in the current set up. TNT have about five channels they could show them on and Sky could easily put different games on Sky Sports PL, Main Event and Arena like they do on the last day of the season.
So does 6.30 Sunday - so far better 3pm Saturday IMO.Sky could broadcast several games at 5pm, but they know you can only watch one game at a time. the broadcasters are selling all you can eat football weekender. 3pm just opens one more slot.
Surely just cos fish and chips is available every day, doesn't mean you have to eat it every day, likewise there's other channels availableGood point, and would some fans choose not to go to a non league game on a cold, wet November Saturday afternoon?
I'm old enough to remember the fist ever televised league game in 1983, Spurs vs Forest, I doubt 40 years later anyone could have forseen the saturation coverage we have of live games now.
Chris Cattlin made a great point about the amount of live football on TV, "I love fish and chips, but I couldn't eat them every day."
My angle was more on - it's not the Firestick that's dodgy, but [maybe] an application installed on it [even though a subscription fee to use is paid].No because watching porn on my laptop isn't illegal (as far as I know). Watching copyrighted content on whatever device (the most popular it would seem is a firestick preloaded with IPTV software and subscription) is. Therefore dodgy.
I get your point but you are be slightly pedantic.
I think perhaps they're more worried about whether a Brighton fan who watches Whitehawk when Brighton are away, would stop watching Whitehawk and watch Brighton on the telly instead.Does it stop people attending lower league games, though? Is someone who is a supporter of (e.g.) Eastbourne Borough going to not attend because they could be watching Man Utd vs Liverpool on the telly?
The 3pm blackout should definitely remain imoI've just raised this on another thread but it would be good to see if my views are out of touch.
Should the 3pm Saturday blackout of televising football stay in place? Pros - arguably gets people to non league, EFL and stops 'pay per view'. Cons - out of date. Anyone with access to the internet can now watch these games and yet non league is more popular than ever. Will also allow the number of TV games to increase without messing with kickoff days and times.
Vote away!