SeagullinExile
Well-known member
Which is why NATO members are significantly upping their defense budgets.About time the West massively ups it's weapons production. Asleep at the wheel at the moment.
Which is why NATO members are significantly upping their defense budgets.About time the West massively ups it's weapons production. Asleep at the wheel at the moment.
I just don't see a reason for China to get involved. That's not their way at all. They watch everyone else fight, and profit on the sidelines.Some commentators have been predicting an East V West global conflict for years. China/Russia/N.Korea Vs NATO is most definitely on the cards within the next 10 years. Maybe sooner.
The clock is ticking closer to midnight.
South China Sea. Taiwan. They WILL make a move one day.I just don't see a reason for China to get involved. That's not their way at all. They watch everyone else fight, and profit on the sidelines.
Well from what Sean Bell says, and I agree with him too, is that Crimea is the crown jewells for Putin....... Stands to reason he'd want an etra arge reserve weapons cache for if/when Ukraine tries to take that back, he'd stick weapons in the hands of locals too no doubt, as Ukraine did at beginning of war.Hmm. Is Russia planning for the future? Why are the weapons produced not reaching the front line? Is it planning for a war with Nato? Maybe Sean Bell's video has assumed more significance.
I agree. They stand to gain nothing from it at all. I expect they'd try and take Taiwan back, but if NATO genuinely was involved in full-scale conflict with Russia, then I can't see how we'd have the will, or the capacity to take on another nuclear-armed superpower. China is still very insular, their way is definitely more along the lines of keep everyone else out of China, rather than go and invade other countries. Which obviously completely contradicts my first sentence, but they don't see Taiwan as another country.I just don't see a reason for China to get involved. That's not their way at all. They watch everyone else fight, and profit on the sidelines.
They likely will, but they'll let Russia and the West wear each other down (assuming they do) before acting, they don't want to provoke a war with the rest themselvesSouth China Sea. Taiwan. They WILL make a move one day.
Russia and China have been aligning themselves militarily for a while now. The odd joint exercises, weapons sales etc. Plus China is without doubt secretly supplying weapons components to Russia.They likely will, but they'll let Russia and the West wear each other down (assuming they do) before acting, they don't want to provoke a war with the rest themselves
I've been hearing similar since I was a lad in the 1960s. Never happened but that isn't to say that it couldn't.Some commentators have been predicting an East V West global conflict for years. China/Russia/N.Korea Vs NATO is most definitely on the cards within the next 10 years. Maybe sooner.
The clock is ticking closer to midnight.
You’re forgetting that the lunatics are running the asylum & most of them have bunkers they can hunker down in.I've been hearing similar since I was a lad in the 1960s. Never happened but that isn't to say that it couldn't.
But if the teams are as you suggest then MAD is the only logical outcome. And therefore it is a waste of time and money to stockpile conventional and even smart weaponry as they will be of no use whatsoever in a global conflict which would inevitably go nuclear and destroy the planet.
Something not making sense: they are stockpiling weapons AND neglecting to resupply the front line of their first target country...?Hmm. Is Russia planning for the future? Why are the weapons produced not reaching the front line? Is it planning for a war with Nato? Maybe Sean Bell's video has assumed more significance.
I think it might depend on the type of weapon: new tanks take a while to build and deploy, whereas 155mm shells are quick to make and probably easy to buy from allies.We have been hearing this stuff for quite a long time now. Without any detailed knowledge on the subject, I'm just not sure I believe it. They are spending something ridiculous like 40% of their State budget on their war effort, aren't they? I can't see how they can run out of weapons with that going on.
IIRC Russia were doing lots of "military exercises" on the Ukrainian border before the invasion and telling the world they had no intentions of invading Ukraine.
With hindsight, the world now knows that Russia tells porkies, perhaps the Russians think that porkies are the norm and Finland are also telling porkies too and are about to invade Russia imminently.
That would be interesting, could Russia fight on two fronts so far apart - surely they'd be too stretched? Obvs not going to happen ....
I think we’ll have one each.Have we got any to spare though?
Other examples from the front line cite no ammo, no water, no food, no support, no comms. ...
Russia is close to being out of weapons.
Some commentators have been predicting an East V West global conflict for years. China/Russia/N.Korea Vs NATO is most definitely on the cards within the next 10 years. Maybe sooner.
I'm not saying it isn't grim for Ukraine. But for a glimpse into how it is on one part of the Russian front line, take a look at this clip from Jake Broe.I don't think that's correct. I think Ukraine are currently suffering from more ammo shortage than Russia. I'm not so sure about tanks where I think Russia are struggling.
NATO being a defensive alliance obviously won’t start a war. There are other actors behind the scenes that would love a global conflict. What better way to cull a population than global war? After all, the planet can’t handle the current growth in population. It will come to a breaking point some time.NATO wouldn't start such a war, and why on earth would China want one? There's nothing to be won.
I agree it doesn't make sense, but this is Russia we're talking about. Has anything they've done in this war made any sense?Something not making sense: they are stockpiling weapons AND neglecting to resupply the front line of their first target country...?
The global population is declining and has been since the 1960’s.NATO being a defensive alliance obviously won’t start a war. There are other actors behind the scenes that would love a global conflict. What better way to cull a population than global war? After all, the planet can’t handle the current growth in population. It will come to a breaking point some time.