ipswichseagull
New member
- Aug 11, 2006
- 48
Which is better?
brightonfan_86 said:Cricket with out a shadow of a doubt, rugby is eggchasing crap.
Gully said:Cricket.
. Locals find it hard to understand how someone could be so ambivolent towards the game they love, when I explain that I grew up in West Sussex where there was little or no rugby
Trigger said:1) Cricket
2) Rugby League
3) Rugby Union
Common as Mook said:Having played both to fairly high level, cricket comes out tops by a country mile.
My main gripe with rugby is that involves little to no skill. If your big and can run and catch, it's a piece of piss.
Icy Gull said:Yeah right Have you ever seen Johnny Wilkinson or Matt Dawson play?
Gully said:Exactly Icy, if you grow up in an area where there is little exposure to a certain sport then the chances of becoming interested in it as either player or spectator are reduced. I reckon the only schools in Sussex where rugby is played to any standard would be the public ones, for those of use edjumecated by the state there was almost none. I grew up in Storrington, I think there might have been a rugby team in Pulborough and maybe one in Horsham but other than that I wouldn't have a clue.
Ask anyone from outside Sussex about stoolball and they will look at you like you are some sort of idiot, but we played that in the summer at school.
Common as Mook said:.
Tell me what skills a prop needs?