Rt. Hon Priti Patel MP (Racism)

[Deleted member 2719]

You have now swerved every single point I have made directly to you, and yet you're still posting on this thread as if nothing's happened.

It's not a good look, but I'm not surprised.

1) they may have you on ignore
2) your not very noteworthy.

I am going for one of those, now which one

 

[Deleted member 2719]

Someone's upset. Considering you've left threads in a huff then come back so many times, we're tempted to rename you Boomerang.

Not a lot keeps me down.

Sorry if that disappoints you, just think of Boris, I am his equivalent.

 

[Diablo]

He's another I reprieved from my ignore list and am now going to have to put back in the box. Call me a snob but I ...just...don't...like...thick people

Your definition of thick being "someone who has differing opinions to yourself" ? if not. What is your definition of thick ?

 

[Grombleton]

Not a lot keeps me down.

Sorry if that disappoints you, just think of Boris, I am his equivalent.

More than I think you realise.

 

[LlcoolJ]

1) they may have you on ignore
2) your not very noteworthy.

I am going for one of those, now which one

It's "you're".

As you're so interested as to butt in, and you say that LBTS is "exactly right" then perhaps you would like to answer the points that he's conveniently ignored?

Oh, no. You'll just chuck insults about as per.

 

[LlcoolJ]

Your definition of thick being "someone who has differing opinions to yourself" ? if not. What is your definition of thick ?

No. If you've been reading this thread it is rather obvious that he is making himself look very thick. That's not a difference of opinion.

What he's written is the opposite of the facts presented (while offering absolutely nothing to back up his incorrect ramblings) - ergo, thick.

 

[LlcoolJ]

Not a lot keeps me down.

Sorry if that disappoints you, just think of Boris, I am his equivalent.

A lying, obese, racist philanderer with stupid hair?

Wouldn't surprise me to be fair.

 

[NooBHA]

You have now swerved every single point I have made directly to you, and yet you're still posting on this thread as if nothing's happened.

It's not a good look, but I'm not surprised.

He doesn't give a Sh!te about answering the points anyone makes.

He only has one thing to say and he says it. There isn't enough actual knowledge within his grasp to counter what anyone challenges his arguments with in order for him to debate it sensibly.

He is 100% entitled to those views and that is absolutely fine by me because what it does is show that not many of the people support such views actually do have a valid argument to support their views. Apart from an indoctrinated childhood that is.

 

[yxee]

I went off her after she went rogue and had unsanctioned meetings with the Israeli Government.

She was sacked, but of course these days they come back and it is all forgotten about.

She is a disgrace.

On that topic wasn't the current education secretary sacked for leaking state secrets?

 

[sparkie]

On that topic wasn't the current education secretary sacked for leaking state secrets?

Yes, that was details of the security council meeting about Huawei.

 

[LlcoolJ]

On that topic wasn't the current education secretary sacked for leaking state secrets?

Not forgetting internet scammer Grant "Michael Green" Shapps.

https://www.theguardian.com/politic...cond-job-as-millioniare-web-marketer-while-mp

What a bunch of utter *****.

 

[Deleted member 2719]

It's "you're".

As you're so interested as to butt in, and you say that LBTS is "exactly right" then perhaps you would like to answer the points that he's conveniently ignored?

Oh, no. You'll just chuck insults about as per.

A lying, obese, racist philanderer with stupid hair?

Wouldn't surprise me to be fair.

Somewhat of a hypocrite then Mr cool?

 

[LlcoolJ]

Somewhat of a hypocrite then Mr cool?

Not in the slightest. I just described Boris Johnson, who you said you should be compared to.

You're really not very good at this are you.

 

[Deleted member 2719]

Not in the slightest. I just described Boris Johnson, who you said you should be compared to.

You're really not very good at this are you.

Another insult then Mr Cool, who's not very good?

 

[LlcoolJ]

Another insult then Mr Cool, who's not very good?

Where's the insult?

You think "you're not very good at this'" is an insult? Blimey, I'm glad I'm not so easily offended! [emoji23]

And the answer to your question is "you" as I already said.

Man alive.....

 

[Deleted member 2719]

Where's the insult?

You think "you're not very good at this'" is an insult? Blimey, I'm glad I'm not so easily offended! [emoji23]

And the answer to your question is "you" as I already said.

Man alive.....

Just a reminder as the left seem to like throwing the insults about like smarties.

 

[Westdene Seagull]

It’s not . Priti is a great example of having a ‘ can do ‘ attitude . She is an example of someone who wants to treat all people the same despite experiencing racism herself . She never tries to portray herself as the victim .

When you say treat everyone the same you obviously mean bully everyone and be nasty to everyone ?

 

[Westdene Seagull]

Exactly right, unfortunately there are a large amount of the far left who only have the attitude of 'can do' when it's complaining, pant wetting, holding a banner, breaking lockdown rules and spreading Covid to all the innocent and vulnerable folk.

Selfish and typical of them.

Not sure how they sleep at night.

You do know those of us on the right see her as a nasty bitch as well yes ?

 

[LlcoolJ]

Just a reminder as the left seem to like throwing the insults about like smarties.

Ok then.

It's like trying to have a debate with a bowl of ice cream.

I'm amazed that you can tie your shoelaces, never mind leave the house without a carer.

As you're such a snowflake I'm sure you'll find this post the epitome of insults. But trust me, I'm being really nice.

Now, I know you find it difficult but have a little think. It was YOU who insulted ME on this thread and then went crying to mummy when you got called out for it.

You also failed to back up LBTS's point that the Home Secretary is really intelligent, despite huge amounts of evidence to the contrary, and zero evidence that she is, and despite me asking you to.

I think the correct phrase is "quit while you're behind". Although I'm sure you won't.

Oh and for the record, I'm not left wing. I'm a centrist, and Priti Patel is still a complete and utter scumbag with zero redeeming features, and almost as thick as you.

Hopefully they're weren't too many long words there for you.

Regards

LL X

 

[Deleted member 2719]

You do know those of us on the right see her as a nasty bitch as well yes ?

I suppose some will, and I don't, I see Jess Philips, Emily Thornberry and Ana soubry in that category.

Ok then.

It's like trying to have a debate with a bowl of ice cream.

I'm amazed that you can tie your shoelaces, never mind leave the house without a carer.

As you're such a snowflake I'm sure you'll find this post the epitome of insults. But trust me, I'm being really nice.

Now, I know you find it difficult but have a little think. It was YOU who insulted ME on this thread and then went crying to mummy when you got called out for it.

You also failed to back up LBTS's point that the Home Secretary is really intelligent, despite huge amounts of evidence to the contrary, and zero evidence that she is, and despite me asking you to.

I think the correct phrase is "quit while you're behind". Although I'm sure you won't.

Oh and for the record, I'm not left wing. I'm a centrist, and Priti Patel is still a complete and utter scumbag with zero redeeming features, and almost as thick as you.

Hopefully they're weren't too many long words there for you.

Regards

LL X

It's there.

I think I will let you COOL down a bit Mr Cool, as it's getting a bit silly now.