jamie the seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 27, 2011
- 2,803
Surely an improvement on Calderon and Chicksen as cover for Bong, which is what we need
Do we really want somebody that Wednesday have brought in Bennett to replace?
Yes if he is seen as better than Calderon and Chicksen sometimes players are crap for one team but good for others.
The only fault I can find in that article is that it has us outside the play off places.
If he's not even as good as Bennett, then definitely no thanks!Yes if he is seen as better than Calderon and Chicksen sometimes players are crap for one team but good for others.
What is to say that we havent agreed to buy him but before doing the deal Wed wanted to bring in a another left back in which case Bennett would have been a cover not a preferred choice.
Only cover for cover though - Pudil is 1st. choice LB at Wednesday.What is to say that we havent agreed to buy him but before doing the deal Wed wanted to bring in a another left back in which case Bennett would have been a cover not a preferred choice.
Not a chance....and still if he was at our standard, Wednesday would be keeping him or at least playing him...he is their chicksen
Burke, and he is long gone.That is down to the opinion of the manager. Somebody at our club rateds COG.