They can believe whatever they like. Doesn’t make it fact.
Indeed - what an earth do people use as the basis for their opinion in this example?!They can believe whatever they like. Doesn’t make it fact.
The Daily Mail?Indeed - what an earth do people use as the basis for their opinion in this example?!
Clearly states YouGovThe Daily Mail?
That states the platform the results were published on.Clearly states YouGov
I see.That states the platform the results were published on.
That’s not what we are talking about. We asked what basis people were basing their opinions on.
Two completely different things.
Can you explain the path leading from YouGov to Daily Mail?The Daily Mail?
What part are you struggling with?Can you explain the path leading from YouGov to Daily Mail?
Asking for a friend.
You are being very dense here.Can you explain the path leading from YouGov to Daily Mail?
Asking for a friend.
Ok, I'll buy it.You are being very dense here.
Just read the thread back. Clampy wrote 'The Daily Mail?' as a direct response to this question:
Indeed - what an earth do people use as the basis for their opinion in this example?!
Where is the evidence to back this up regarding the Daily Mail, that's all I ask?What part are you struggling with?
Yougov is publishing people's opinions on policing
Clamp and Jim are asking where the people got their information to form those opinions.
What folk may not be aware of is that much of that aid budget is conditional and attached to foreign policy. Many years ago I chatted with a charity head who really opened my eyes to it.Cameron committed to 0.7, but the UK has had that as a target, since 1970 as a UN member, its lower currently as a result of Covid debt, and won't go back up until borrowing has been reduced.
Every Government since 1970 has had a Foreign Aid budget, in every developed country.
My god POTG do you really need this explaining to this extent.Where is the evidence to back this up regarding the Daily Mail, that's all I ask?
What?I must say this exchange explains a bit.
Yes, some of it may end up in useless projects, but it still buys some influence.What folk may not be aware of is that much of that aid budget is conditional and attached to foreign policy. Many years ago I chatted with a charity head who really opened my eyes to it.
Where is the evidence to back this up regarding the Daily Mail, that's all I ask?
There certainly is, if accountancy is too exciting there's always actuarial or auditing for a huge multinational
And then ranting about the very same on here
Maybe before, but take Worthing, both East and West, back in the day it was said you could put a Blue rosette of a Chimpanzee and the good burghers would return it as their honourable member.I think we just found out that it wasn't a waste of time in most seats. There seem to be very few 'safe seats ' now given the volatile electorate. By the way I 'm not defending FPTP , I voted to change it but if you voted to keep it or didn't vote at all then you can't really complain how it works.
I have no other way of explaining it to you. I’m not sure how you haven’t understood.Where is the evidence to back this up regarding the Daily Mail, that's all I ask?